Paper · 2004 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils

J. A. Quaggio; P. B. Gallo; C. Owino-Gerroh; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Liming acid soils is considered to assure the availability of Mo in crops. Additionally, in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) the positive response to liming is associated to a better supply of Ca+2, Mo for the nitrogenase-complex activity, and other non-nitrogen fixing activities of the crop. This study was thus undertaken to assess the effect of lime, Mo, and the lime-Mo interaction on peanut crop, on an acid Ultisol at the Mococa Experimental Station, Instituto Agronômico, São Paulo State, Brazil, from 1987 to 1990. A randomized complete block design with four replications, in a 4 x 4 factorial arrangement, was used in the study. The factors included four lime rates (0, 2, 4, and 6 t ha-1) broadcast and incorporated into the soil, and Mo (0, 100, 200, and 300 g ha-1) as (NH4)2MoO4 applied as seed dressing. Lime was applied once at the beginning of the study while Mo was applied at every planting. Peanut seed cv 'tatu' was used. Significant increase in peanut kernel yield with liming was only evident in the absence of Mo, whereas the peanut response to Mo was observed in two out of the three harvests. A higher yield response (28 % increase) was found when Mo was applied without liming. Soil molybdenum availability, as indicated by plant leaf analysis, increased significantly when lime was applied. Molybdenum fertilization led to higher leaf N content, which in turn increased peanut yield in treatments with smaller lime doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly increased peanut kernel yield only without Mo.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
peanut kernel yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
only evident in the absence of Moe0
Comparator
absence of Moe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in peanut kernel yield with liming was only evident in the absence of Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut responded to Mo in two of three harvests.

Treatment
Moe0
Outcome
peanut responsee0
Value
two out of the three harvestse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the peanut response to Mo was observed in two out of the three harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo without lime raised peanut yield by 28%.

Treatment
Moe0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
highere0
Value
28 %e0
Comparator
without liminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher yield response (28 % increase) was found when Mo was applied without liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime significantly increased soil Mo availability as indicated by peanut leaf analysis.

Treatment
limee0
Outcome
Soil molybdenum availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil molybdenum availability, as indicated by plant leaf analysis, increased significantly when lime was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo fertilization raised peanut leaf N content.

Treatment
Molybdenum fertilizatione0
Outcome
leaf N contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molybdenum fertilization led to higher leaf N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher leaf N content increased peanut yield at smaller lime doses.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
smaller lime dosese0
Outcome
peanut yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
treatments with smaller lime dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher leaf N content, which in turn increased peanut yield in treatments with smaller lime doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

molybdenum atom · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 133 positive, 9 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.