Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Molybdenum increased peanut grain yield by 17.7% only in 2017–2018.

A claim from Peanut response to co‐inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense and molybdenum application in sandy soil of the Brazilian Cerrado · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum increased peanut grain yield by 17.7% only in 2017–2018.

Treatment
Mo‐treatede0
Outcome
crop grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
17.7%e0
Qualifier
only in the 2017–2018 seasone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of crop grain yield was significantly greater (17.7%) in Mo‐treated plants only in the 2017–2018 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1553
e1

“yield of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–646

Title

Peanut response to co‐inoculation of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense and molybdenum application in sandy soil of the Brazilian Cerrado

Fábio Steiner; Ludmila Freitas Marques de Queiroz; Alan Mario Zuffo; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20519

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ede5dfe79f16cd8d2cb4215acfb0ee2096d30351b74e36db477adef5a14d4b12 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Mo without lime raised peanut yield by 28%.

    Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils · 2004 · compared with without liming

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.