Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omission of Mo did not change peanut seed yield.

A claim from Diagnosing multiple nutrient deficiencies that limit crop growth and yield on sands in south-central coastal Vietnam · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omission of Mo did not change peanut seed yield.

Treatment
Omission of Moe3
Outcome
seed yielde3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Omission of Mo depressed shoot dry matter (DM) of peanut in the Cat Hanh site in 2011 but not seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1214

Title

Diagnosing multiple nutrient deficiencies that limit crop growth and yield on sands in south-central coastal Vietnam

Thi Le Thu Hoang; Tung-Lam Do; Thi Thu Nhan Nguyen; et al. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University) 2015

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a7a5ec8da85a76ee680cecdb8ab357a5325241b2fa6c8b2181bd2c9d86a18f76 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.