Paper · 2004 · Agricultural science digest

Effect of Boron and Molybdenum on their Uptake and Yield of Groundnut

G.M. Shankhe; Pravin Naphade; H. N. Ravankar; et al.

Read at the source ↗OpenAlex W1489938874 ↗In the paper network →

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a field experiment on the effect of boron and molybdenum were studied on groundnut for Yield, their uptake by groundnut and their availability at critical growth stages. The results revealed that foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizers were found to be superior in increasing production level as well as availability of boron and molybdenum and their uptake by groundnut over recommended doses of fertilizers alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron plus soil molybdenum with recommended fertilizer increased production versus recommended fertilizer alone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Outcome
production levele0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
recommended doses of fertilizers alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizers were found to be superior in increasing production level as well as availability of boron and molybdenum and their uptake by groundnut over recommended doses of fertilizers alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased boron and molybdenum availability relative to fertilizer alone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Outcome
availability of boron and molybdenume0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
recommended doses of fertilizers alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizers were found to be superior in increasing production level as well as availability of boron and molybdenum and their uptake by groundnut over recommended doses of fertilizers alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased groundnut uptake of boron and molybdenum relative to fertilizer alone.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Outcome
their uptake by groundnute0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
recommended doses of fertilizers alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applicatIon of boron + soil application of molybdenum along with recommended dose of fertilizers were found to be superior in increasing production level as well as availability of boron and molybdenum and their uptake by groundnut over recommended doses of fertilizers alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–481 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

    YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Co and Mo doses did not affect pod yield.

    Cobalt and molybdenum stimulate compounds of primary metabolism, nitrogen forms, and photosynthetic pigments in peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    B and Mo fertilization did not increase unshelled nut yield.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE - POD YIELD RELATIONSHIP DUE TO MACRO AND MICRONUTRIENTS IN RAINFED SPANISH GROUNDNUT · 1984

    Opposite direction

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

boron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Boron application gave higher yield attributes and seed yield than molybdenum application.

    Effect of Seed Priming and Coating through Micronutrient Application on Growth and Seed Yield of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2022 · compared with molybdenum application

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Fruit and seed production and yield did not vary with boron nutrition.

    Translocation of Boron to Plant Fruits · 1975

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Boron application did not increase peanut yield.

    Assessing Boron Needs for Improving Peanut Yield and Quality · 1974

    Opposite direction

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Molybdenum levels above 12 ppm reduced the promotive effect on groundnut.

    Groundnut Physiological and Chemical Response to Molybdenum · 2012

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    B and Mo fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE - POD YIELD RELATIONSHIP DUE TO MACRO AND MICRONUTRIENTS IN RAINFED SPANISH GROUNDNUT · 1984

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Mo fertilization raised peanut leaf N content.

    Peanut response to lime and molybdenum application in low pH soils · 2004

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    B application enhanced groundnut pod B content.

    Long-Term Impact of Boron Addition at Various Dosages to a Groundnut-Cabbage System on Crop Yield and Boron Dynamics in Typic Haplustepts · 2023

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Boron topdressing improved boron content and accumulation in peanut stems and leaves.

    Effects of drip irrigation and topdressing on dry matter weight, mineral nutrient absorption and yield of pod-bearing stage in peanut · 2020

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Calcium and boron fertilizer increased calcium and boron contents in mature peanut plants.

    Effects of calcium and boron on the growth, yield and quality of peanut · 2001

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 42 positive, 3 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Foliar N, P, K and S fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake of peanuts.

    Foliar Fertilization Effects on Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Vegetative Characteristics of Florunner Peanuts.1,2 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar FeSO4 spray at different stages had no significant difference in available soil N, P, K, S and Fe.

    Effect of Sulphur and Iron on chlorophyll Content, Leghaemoglobin Content, Soil Properties and Optimum Dose of Sulphurfor Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar iron had no significant effect on measured soil fertility status.

    Nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility as influenced by integrated nitrogen management and foliar spray of iron in groundnut on Typic Ustochrept · 2021

    Opposite direction

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Greenhouse lime, herbicide, or fertilizer applications did not affect plant morphology or leaf N content.

    Effects of Herbicides, a Nematicide and Rhizobium Inoculant on Yield, Chemical Composition and Nodulation of Starr Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar N, P, K and S fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake of peanuts.

    Foliar Fertilization Effects on Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Vegetative Characteristics of Florunner Peanuts.1,2 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Kelud volcanic ash and manure treatment did not significantly affect exchangeable Ca or Ca uptake.

    Ketersediaan dan Serapan Ca Pada Kacang Tanah di Tanah Alfisols yang Diberi Abu Vulkanik Kelud dan Pupuk Kandang · 2017

    Opposite direction

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar fertilizer application did not increase peanut yield within site-years.

    Foliar Fertilization as a Strategy to Increase the Proportion of Mature Pods in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    25 ppm NAA did not significantly change flower production.

    MOISTURE STRESS AND HORMONAL INFLUENCE ON THE FLOWERING BEHAVIOUR AND YIELD OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA ) · 1986

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Soil or foliar K2SO4 produced the lowest pod yield measures.

    The effect of potassium on performance and production of groundnut grown on Rudua series soil · 2011

    Opposite direction

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Cover crop nitrogen fertilization did not influence peanut pod yield.

    Nitrogen Supply for Cover Crops and Effects on Peanut Grown in Succession under a No‐Till System · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing the added amount of FYM significantly decreased peanut shelling percentage, pod number and seeds per pod.

    Fog water harvesting providing stability for small Bedwe communities lives in North cost of Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Peanut yields were unchanged by N fertilization.

    Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess · 2023

    Opposite direction

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.