Paper · 2003 · Agricultural science digest

YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR

T. Chitdeshwari; S. Poongothai

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Front line demonstration conducted in the farmer's on the response of groundnut to the application of multi micronutrients to soil and also as seed treatment indicated that the soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1 significantly increased the pod yield to the tune of 24.2% for TMV 7 and 14.8% for JL 24 over control. Inclusion of Mo did not show any significant effect on pod yield of groundnut. Seed treatment was less effective than soil application. Similar trend of results was observed with nutrient uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1 significantly increased groundnut pod yield by 24.2% for TMV 7 over control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Material
TMV 7e1
Treatment
soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
24.2%e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
farmer'se2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1 significantly increased the pod yield to the tune of 24.2% for TMV 7 and 14.8% for JL 24 over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“Front line demonstration conducted in the farmer's on the response of groundnut to the application of multi micronutrients to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1 significantly increased groundnut pod yield by 14.8% for JL 24 over control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Material
JL 24e1
Treatment
soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.8%e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
farmer'se2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the soil application of Zn 5 kg ha−1 + B 1.0 kg ha−1 + S 40 kg ha−1 significantly increased the pod yield to the tune of 24.2% for TMV 7 and 14.8% for JL 24 over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–342 · show in text ↑
e2

“Front line demonstration conducted in the farmer's on the response of groundnut to the application of multi micronutrients to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
Inclusion of Moe3
Outcome
pod yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Inclusion of Mo did not show any significant effect on pod yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with the multi-micronutrient mix was less effective than soil application in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Treatment
Seed treatmente4
Outcome
effectivee4
Direction
lesse4
Comparator
soil applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Front line demonstration conducted in the farmer's on the response of groundnut to the application of multi micronutrients to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seed treatment was less effective than soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–478 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut nutrient uptake showed a trend similar to the pod-yield results.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae2
Outcome
nutrient uptakee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Front line demonstration conducted in the farmer's on the response of groundnut to the application of multi micronutrients to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e5

“Similar trend of results was observed with nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–538 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.