Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

A claim from YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inclusion of Mo did not significantly affect groundnut pod yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Treatment
Inclusion of Moe3
Outcome
pod yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Inclusion of Mo did not show any significant effect on pod yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–421

Title

YIELD OF GROUNDNUT AND ITS NUTRIENT UPTAKE AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC, BORON AND SULPHUR

T. Chitdeshwari; S. Poongothai Agricultural science digest 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-bb24c3f3abd92a55088d2e7d71f0f3997ac1581d8b62b316bf6ba1c68547e492 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.