Paper · 1982 · Canadian Journal of Animal Science

THE EFFECT OF PLANTING DENSITY ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF CORN SILAGE FOR LACTATING COWS

L. J. FISHER; N. A. FAIREY

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A late-maturing corn hybrid, Funk brand G4444, was planted in 2-ha plots at 60 000 plants per hectare (low density) and at 100 000 plants per hectare (high density). At harvest, the dry matter and ear contents were 24.2 and 34%, respectively, for the low-density treatment and 22.8 and 28%, respectively, for the high-density treatment. Two groups of 10 lactating cows were used to compare the nutritive value of the ensiled forages over a 10-wk feeding period. Silage dry matter intake, milk yield and milk fat content were 10.33 kg/day, 27.11 kg/day and 3.52% for the cows fed high-density silage compared to 11.79 kg/day, 31.88 kg/day and 2.91% for those fed the low-density silage. Feeding the low-density silage resulted in a decreased level of acetic acid in the rumen and an increased level of propionic acid. Blood hematocrit and plasma calcium levels were lower for cows fed the silage from the low-density planting. Dry matter digestibility of the complete ration was 72.5 and 71.8% for the high- and low-density plantings, respectively. It was concluded that an increased ear content of approximately 10 percentage units resulted in a corn silage which was consumed more readily, altered rumen fermentation and caused a decrease in milk fat content. Key words: Corn silage, lactating dairy cows, planting density

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting lowered ear content of the corn silage (28% versus 34%).

Material
Funk brand G4444e0
Organ / stage
eare1
Treatment
high-density treatmente1
Outcome
ear contentse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
28%e1
Qualifier
34%e1
Comparator
low-density treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“A late-maturing corn hybrid, Funk brand G4444, was planted in 2-ha plots at 60 000 plants per hectare (low density) and at 100 000 plants per hectare (high density)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, the dry matter and ear contents were 24.2 and 34%, respectively, for the low-density treatment and 22.8 and 28%, respectively, for the high-density treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting lowered dry matter content of the corn silage (22.8% versus 24.2%).

Material
Funk brand G4444e0
Treatment
high-density treatmente1
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
22.8e1
Comparator
low-density treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“A late-maturing corn hybrid, Funk brand G4444, was planted in 2-ha plots at 60 000 plants per hectare (low density) and at 100 000 plants per hectare (high density)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, the dry matter and ear contents were 24.2 and 34%, respectively, for the low-density treatment and 22.8 and 28%, respectively, for the high-density treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cows fed high-density silage had lower silage dry matter intake (10.33 versus 11.79 kg/day).

Treatment
high-density silagee2
Outcome
Silage dry matter intakee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
10.33 kg/daye2
Comparator
the low-density silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage dry matter intake, milk yield and milk fat content were 10.33 kg/day, 27.11 kg/day and 3.52% for the cows fed high-density silage compared to 11.79 kg/day, 31.88 kg/day and 2.91% for those fed the low-density silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cows fed high-density silage had lower milk yield (27.11 versus 31.88 kg/day).

Treatment
high-density silagee2
Outcome
milk yielde2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
27.11 kg/daye2
Comparator
the low-density silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage dry matter intake, milk yield and milk fat content were 10.33 kg/day, 27.11 kg/day and 3.52% for the cows fed high-density silage compared to 11.79 kg/day, 31.88 kg/day and 2.91% for those fed the low-density silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cows fed high-density silage had higher milk fat content (3.52% versus 2.91%).

Treatment
high-density silagee2
Outcome
milk fat contente2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
3.52%e2
Comparator
the low-density silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Silage dry matter intake, milk yield and milk fat content were 10.33 kg/day, 27.11 kg/day and 3.52% for the cows fed high-density silage compared to 11.79 kg/day, 31.88 kg/day and 2.91% for those fed the low-density silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding low-density silage decreased the level of acetic acid in the rumen.

Organ / stage
rumene3
Treatment
low-density silagee3
Outcome
acetic acid in the rumene3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“Feeding the low-density silage resulted in a decreased level of acetic acid in the rumen and an increased level of propionic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding low-density silage increased the level of propionic acid in the rumen.

Organ / stage
rumene3
Treatment
low-density silagee3
Outcome
propionic acide3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“Feeding the low-density silage resulted in a decreased level of acetic acid in the rumen and an increased level of propionic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blood hematocrit and plasma calcium levels were lower in cows fed low-density planting silage.

Treatment
low-density plantinge4
Outcome
Blood hematocrit and plasma calcium levelse4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“Blood hematocrit and plasma calcium levels were lower for cows fed the silage from the low-density planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter digestibility of the complete ration was 72.5 and 71.8% for high- and low-density plantings.

Treatment
high- and low-density plantingse5
Outcome
Dry matter digestibility of the complete ratione5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
72.5 and 71.8%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Dry matter digestibility of the complete ration was 72.5 and 71.8% for the high- and low-density plantings, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1046 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased ear content of about 10 percentage units is associated with a decrease in milk fat content.

Treatment
an increased ear contente6
Outcome
milk fat contente6
Direction
decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“an increased ear content of approximately 10 percentage units resulted in a corn silage which was consumed more readily, altered rumen fermentation and caused a decrease in milk fat content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1259 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased ear content made the corn silage more readily consumed.

Treatment
an increased ear contente6
Outcome
consumede6
Direction
more readilye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“an increased ear content of approximately 10 percentage units resulted in a corn silage which was consumed more readily, altered rumen fermentation and caused a decrease in milk fat content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1259 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased ear content altered rumen fermentation of cows fed the silage.

Treatment
an increased ear contente6
Outcome
rumen fermentatione6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN SILAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“an increased ear content of approximately 10 percentage units resulted in a corn silage which was consumed more readily, altered rumen fermentation and caused a decrease in milk fat content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1259 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 39 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 40 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.