Paper · 1974 · Experimental Agriculture

Correlative Analysis of Yield and its Components in Maize

K. P. Prabhakaran Nair; R. P. Singh

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY At Pantnagar, India, linear response in maize to nitrogen application was observed up to 150 kg. of N/ha. with some of the most promising hybrids and composites released by the All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Programme. Increase in grain yield, and total nitrogen accumulation in grain, were substantially more in Ganga 2 than in the local cultivar or the composites, at higher rates of N application. In absolute terms, the local cultivar accumulated more nitrogen in its grain, but the relative amounts declined at higher rates of N application. Among the yield components influencing ultimate grain yield, barrenness exerted a negative influence on grain yield through the number of cobs per plot. Among cob characters, such as thousand grain weight and number of grains per cob, the former exerted a substantial influence on grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize responded linearly to nitrogen application up to 150 kg of N per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
linear responsee0
Direction
linear responsee0
Value
150 kg. of N/ha.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linear response in maize to nitrogen application was observed up to 150 kg. of N/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher nitrogen rates, grain yield increased more in Ganga 2 than in the local cultivar or composites.

Taxon
graine0
Material
Ganga 2e0
Treatment
higher rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Increasee0
Comparator
the local cultivar or the compositese0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in grain yield, and total nitrogen accumulation in grain, were substantially more in Ganga 2 than in the local cultivar or the composites, at higher rates of N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher nitrogen rates, grain nitrogen accumulation increased more in Ganga 2 than in the local cultivar or composites.

Taxon
graine0
Material
Ganga 2e0
Treatment
higher rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulation in graine0
Direction
Increasee0
Comparator
the local cultivar or the compositese0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in grain yield, and total nitrogen accumulation in grain, were substantially more in Ganga 2 than in the local cultivar or the composites, at higher rates of N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–418 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The local cultivar had greater absolute nitrogen accumulation in grain.

Taxon
graine0
Material
the local cultivare0
Outcome
nitrogen in its graine0
Direction
moree0

Verbatim

e0

“In absolute terms, the local cultivar accumulated more nitrogen in its grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative grain nitrogen amounts declined at higher nitrogen application rates.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
relative amountse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative amounts declined at higher rates of N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barrenness negatively influenced maize grain yield through cobs per plot.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
negative influencee0
Qualifier
number of cobs per plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barrenness exerted a negative influence on grain yield through the number of cobs per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grain weight substantially influenced maize grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thousand grain weight and number of grains per cob, the former exerted a substantial influence on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑