Paper · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Long Term Effects of High CO2Concentration on Photosynthesis of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes(Mart.) Solms)

A. LARIGAUDERIE; J. ROY; A. BERGER

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The photosynthetic response to CO2 concentration, light intensity and temperature was investigated in water hyacinth plants (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) grown in summer at ambient CO2 or at 10000 μmol(CO2) mol−1 and in winter at 6000 μmol(CO2) mol−1 Plants grown and measured at ambient CO2 had high photosynthetic rate (35 μmo1(CO2) m−2 s−1), high saturating photon flux density (1500–2000) μmol m−2 s−1 and low sensitivity to temperature in the range 20–40 °C. Maximum photosynthetic rate (63 μmol(CO2) m−2 s−1) was reached at an internal CO2 concentration of 800 μmol mol−1. Plants grown at high CO2 in summer had photosynthetic capacities at ambient CO2 which were 15% less than for plants grown at ambient CO2, but maximum photosynthetic rates were similar. Photosynthesis by plants grown at high CO2 and high light intensity had typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2, but for plants grown under high CO2 and low light and plants grown under low CO2 and high light intensity photosynthetic rates decreased sharply at internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water hyacinth grown and measured at ambient CO2 had a high photosynthetic rate (35 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1).

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Outcome
high photosynthetic ratee0
Value
35 μmo1(CO2) m−2 s−1e0
Qualifier
grown and measured at ambient CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown and measured at ambient CO2 had high photosynthetic rate (35 μmo1(CO2) m−2 s−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown and measured at ambient CO2 had a high saturating photon flux density of 1500-2000 μmol m-2 s-1.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Outcome
saturating photon flux densitye0
Value
(1500–2000) μmol m−2 s−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high saturating photon flux density (1500–2000) μmol m−2 s−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown and measured at ambient CO2 had low sensitivity to temperature in the range 20-40 °C.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Outcome
low sensitivity to temperaturee0
Qualifier
20–40 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low sensitivity to temperature in the range 20–40 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–469 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum photosynthetic rate (63 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1) was reached at an internal CO2 concentration of 800 μmol mol-1.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Outcome
Maximum photosynthetic ratee0
Value
63 μmol(CO2) m−2 s−1e0
Qualifier
internal CO2 concentration of 800 μmol mol−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum photosynthetic rate (63 μmol(CO2) m−2 s−1) was reached at an internal CO2 concentration of 800 μmol mol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown at high CO2 in summer had photosynthetic capacities at ambient CO2 that were 15% less than plants grown at ambient CO2.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Treatment
grown at high CO2 in summere0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitiese0
Direction
lesse0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
plants grown at ambient CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown at high CO2 in summer had photosynthetic capacities at ambient CO2 which were 15% less than for plants grown at ambient CO2, but maximum photosynthetic rates were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum photosynthetic rates were similar between plants grown at high CO2 and at ambient CO2.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Treatment
grown at high CO2 in summere0
Outcome
maximum photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
plants grown at ambient CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown at high CO2 in summer had photosynthetic capacities at ambient CO2 which were 15% less than for plants grown at ambient CO2, but maximum photosynthetic rates were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis of plants grown at high CO2 and high light intensity had typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Treatment
high CO2 and high light intensitye0
Outcome
typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis by plants grown at high CO2 and high light intensity had typical response curves to internal CO2 concentration with saturation at high CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For plants grown under high CO2 and low light, photosynthetic rates decreased sharply at internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol-1.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Treatment
high CO2 and low lighte0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
decreased sharplye0
Qualifier
internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for plants grown under high CO2 and low light and plants grown under low CO2 and high light intensity photosynthetic rates decreased sharply at internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For plants grown under low CO2 and high light intensity, photosynthetic rates decreased sharply at internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol-1.

Taxon
Water HyacinthPontederia crassipest0
Treatment
low CO2 and high light intensitye0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
decreased sharplye0
Qualifier
internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontederia crassipes
Pontederia crassipes · TaxonIvandro batista de q… · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for plants grown under high CO2 and low light and plants grown under low CO2 and high light intensity photosynthetic rates decreased sharply at internal CO2 concentrations above 1000 μmol−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Hyacinth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Pontederia crassipes (water hyacinth)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.