Paper · 2000 · Annals of Botany

Comparative Epidermal Ultrastructure of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Leaf, Bract and Capsule Wall

B Bondada

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cotton leaves are more physiologically active than the bract and the capsule wall of the fruiting structures. To elucidate the disparities in their physiological behaviour, epidermal cell density, stomatal index, stomatal size, trichome density and type, and epicuticular wax ultrastructure of cotton leaf, bract and capsule wall were delineated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The epidermal cells of the outer periclinal walls on both surfaces of the leaf and bract were raised and convex. Conversely, the capsule wall epidermal cells were polygonal with flat outer periclinal walls. The stomatal complex in the leaf and bract was paracytic, whereas in the capsule wall the stomatal complex was anomocytic. The adaxial and abaxial stomata of the leaf were coplanar to the epidermal surface, as opposed to the raised adaxial stomata on the bract. On the contrary, the stomata on the capsule wall surface appeared to be slightly sunken. Furthermore, the capsule wall stomata were larger than the stomata on either surface of both the leaf and the bract. The stomatal index was greater on the abaxial surfaces of the leaf and the bract (18.4 and 9.4, respectively) than their corresponding adaxial surfaces (14.4 and 4.7, respectively). Leaves had the highest stomatal index followed by the bract and the capsule wall. The indumentum consisted of glandular and nonglandular trichomes, the density of which was greater on the abaxial surfaces than on the adaxial surfaces of the leaf and bract. The capsule wall indumentum lacked nonglandular trichomes. Epicuticular wax occurred in the form of striations. However, the striation pattern varied among the organs. This study clearly illustrates morphological disparities in the epidermal features of leaf, bract and capsule wall, helping to explain their physiological divergence. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and bract epidermal cells had raised, convex outer periclinal walls on both surfaces.

Organ / stage
leaf and bracte0
Outcome
raised and convexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The epidermal cells of the outer periclinal walls on both surfaces of the leaf and bract were raised and convex.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsule wall epidermal cells were polygonal with flat outer periclinal walls.

Organ / stage
capsule walle0
Outcome
polygonal with flat outer periclinal wallse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the capsule wall epidermal cells were polygonal with flat outer periclinal walls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and bract stomatal complexes were paracytic.

Organ / stage
leaf and bracte0
Outcome
paracytice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal complex in the leaf and bract was paracytic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsule wall stomatal complexes were anomocytic.

Organ / stage
capsule walle0
Outcome
anomocytice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the capsule wall the stomatal complex was anomocytic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf stomata on both surfaces were coplanar to the epidermis.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
coplanar to the epidermal surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adaxial and abaxial stomata of the leaf were coplanar to the epidermal surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bract adaxial stomata were raised.

Organ / stage
bracte0
Outcome
raised adaxial stomatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the raised adaxial stomata on the bract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsule wall stomata appeared slightly sunken.

Organ / stage
capsule walle0
Outcome
slightly sunkene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stomata on the capsule wall surface appeared to be slightly sunken.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsule wall stomata were larger than leaf and bract stomata.

Organ / stage
capsule walle0
Outcome
stomatae0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
leaf and the bracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the capsule wall stomata were larger than the stomata on either surface of both the leaf and the bract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf abaxial stomatal index was 18.4 versus 14.4 adaxially.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
stomatal indexe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
18.4e0
Qualifier
14.4e0
Comparator
adaxial surfacese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal index was greater on the abaxial surfaces of the leaf and the bract (18.4 and 9.4, respectively) than their corresponding adaxial surfaces (14.4 and 4.7, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bract abaxial stomatal index was 9.4 versus 4.7 adaxially.

Organ / stage
bracte0
Outcome
stomatal indexe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.4e0
Qualifier
4.7e0
Comparator
adaxial surfacese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal index was greater on the abaxial surfaces of the leaf and the bract (18.4 and 9.4, respectively) than their corresponding adaxial surfaces (14.4 and 4.7, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves had the highest stomatal index, followed by bract and capsule wall.

Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
stomatal indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
bract and the capsule walle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves had the highest stomatal index followed by the bract and the capsule wall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and bract indumentum contained glandular and nonglandular trichomes with greater abaxial density.

Organ / stage
leaf and bracte0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
glandular and nonglandular trichomese0
Comparator
adaxial surfacese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The indumentum consisted of glandular and nonglandular trichomes, the density of which was greater on the abaxial surfaces than on the adaxial surfaces of the leaf and bract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capsule wall indumentum lacked nonglandular trichomes.

Organ / stage
capsule walle0
Outcome
lacked nonglandular trichomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The capsule wall indumentum lacked nonglandular trichomes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epicuticular wax formed striations whose pattern varied among organs.

Outcome
striation pattern varied among the organse0
Qualifier
Epicuticular wax occurred in the form of striationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Epicuticular wax occurred in the form of striations. However, the striation pattern varied among the organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epidermal morphological disparities help explain physiological divergence among the organs.

Outcome
physiological divergencee0
Qualifier
morphological disparities in the epidermal featurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study clearly illustrates morphological disparities in the epidermal features of leaf, bract and capsule wall, helping to explain their physiological divergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑