Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Life Sciences

Management Fusarium Wilt of Sweet Pepper by Bacillus Strains

Abada K. A.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Isolation trials from the roots of wilted sweet pepper plants yielded Alternaria spp., Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium spp., Rhizontonia solani , Sclerotium rolfsii and Trichoderma spp. The isolates of the fungus F. oxysporum were selected to test their pathogenicity and Kalubia isolate was the most virulent one. The fungus was virulent to sweet pepper and low infection was found in case of the other five tested plants. Therefore, the fungus F. oxysporum named Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. capsici. All the five Bacillus strains, i.e. Bacillus chitinosporus ,B. coagulans , B. humilus ,B.subtilis and B. thuringiensis caused significant reduction to the radial growth of F.o.f.sp.capsici compared with control treatment. In addition, the growth of the tested pathogen was completely inhibited by B.subtilis and B.thuringiensis at the concentration of 60%. Furthermore, B.thuringiensis was the most efficient bioagent in this regard followed by B.subtilis then B.pumilus. Adding the three tested bioagents ,i.e.B.pumilus .B.subtilis and B. Thuringiensis to soil infested with F.o.f.sp.capsici resulted in significant reduction to sweet pepper wilt with significant increase to the plant height as well as the number of pods and their weight / plant compared with control treatment. The symptoms of the disease were obvious both on the foliage growth and the xylem vesicles, but the severity of the disease was more higher on the xylem vesicles than on the foliage growth. In addition, plants grown in soil infested with Bacillus strains were of high values of plant height and fruit yield (number and weight / plant) than that grown in the control (uninfested soil). The total phenolic compounds were greatly increased in the bacterial treated plants as compared to untreated plants with the bioagents and that infested with the pathogen only. These results give a potential of these bacterial strains for use as plant protection agents against Fusarium wilt of sweet pepper. This work was performed to investigate the potential of some bacterial bioagents ,i.e. B. humilus , B.subtilis and B. thuringiensis on management of sweet pepper Fusarium wilt and the formation of phenolic compounds in the plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilted pepper roots yielded several fungal taxa.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
wilted sweet pepper plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolation trials from the roots of wilted sweet pepper plants yielded Alternaria spp., Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium spp., Rhizontonia solani , Sclerotium rolfsii and Trichoderma spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Kalubia Fusarium isolate was most virulent.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Material
Kalubia isolatee0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
most virulent onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The isolates of the fungus F. oxysporum were selected to test their pathogenicity and Kalubia isolate was the most virulent one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus was virulent on sweet pepper but had low infection on five other plants.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume1pathogene0
Outcome
virulent to sweet peppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus was virulent to sweet pepper and low infection was found in case of the other five tested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“The isolates of the fungus F. oxysporum were selected to test their pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Bacillus strains significantly reduced pathogen radial growth.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
F.o.f.sp.capsicie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth of F.o.f.sp.capsicie0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the five Bacillus strains, i.e. Bacillus chitinosporus ,B. coagulans , B. humilus ,B.subtilis and B. thuringiensis caused significant reduction to the radial growth of F.o.f.sp.capsici compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis completely inhibited pathogen growth at 60%.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
B.subtilise0
Interactor
tested pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
B.subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the tested pathogene0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of the tested pathogen was completely inhibited by B.subtilis and B.thuringiensis at the concentration of 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis completely inhibited pathogen growth at 60%.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
B.thuringiensise0
Interactor
tested pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
B.thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the tested pathogene0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of the tested pathogen was completely inhibited by B.subtilis and B.thuringiensis at the concentration of 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis was the most efficient bioagent.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Interactor
B.thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most efficient bioagente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B.thuringiensis was the most efficient bioagent in this regard followed by B.subtilis then B.pumilus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three Bacillus bioagents significantly reduced pepper wilt.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
three tested bioagentse0
Interactor
F.o.f.sp.capsicie0pathogen
Second interactor
B.pumilusBacillus pumiluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sweet pepper wilte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding the three tested bioagents ,i.e.B.pumilus .B.subtilis and B. Thuringiensis to soil infested with F.o.f.sp.capsici resulted in significant reduction to sweet pepper wilt with significant increase to the plant height as well as the number of pods and their weight / plant compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The bioagents significantly increased pepper plant height and pod number and weight.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
three tested bioagentse1
Outcome
plant height as well as the number of podse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase to the plant height as well as the number of pods and their weight / plant compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding the three tested bioagents ,i.e.B.pumilus .B.subtilis and B. Thuringiensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity was higher in xylem vessels than foliage.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
xylem vesiclese0
Outcome
severity of the diseasee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliage growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the severity of the disease was more higher on the xylem vesicles than on the foliage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus treated plants had higher height and fruit yield than controls.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height and fruit yielde0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
control (uninfested soil)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown in soil infested with Bacillus strains were of high values of plant height and fruit yield (number and weight / plant) than that grown in the control (uninfested soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment greatly increased phenolics versus untreated and pathogen only plants.

Taxon
Sweet PepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
bacterial treated plantse0
Outcome
total phenolic compoundse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total phenolic compounds were greatly increased in the bacterial treated plants as compared to untreated plants with the bioagents and that infested with the pathogen only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–40 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.