Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Adjusting Midseason Nitrogen Rate Using a Sensor-Based Optimization Algorithm to Increase Use Efficiency in Corn

B. S. Tubaña; D. B. Arnall; O. Walsh; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
82
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study was conducted to formulate an in-season nitrogen (N) fertilization optimization algorithm (NFOA) to estimate midseason N rates that maximize corn (Zea mays L.) growth and minimize fertilizer inputs. Treatments included: a zero kg N ha−1; three treatments of 134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate applied in split, preplant, or sidedress; two treatments of 67 kg N ha−1 fixed rate preplant or sidedress applied; three NFOA-based midseason N rates (RI-NFOA, RICV-NFOA, flat-RICV-NFOA) with (67 kg N ha−1) and without preplant N; and two resolutions (0.34 and 2.32 m2) tested for RICV-NFOA only. With the 67 kg N ha−1 preplant application, midseason RI-NFOA-based N rates resulted in an N use efficiency (NUE) of 65% while the 134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate split applied had 56% NUE. Using the RICV-NFOA, NUE and net returns to N fertilizer were higher when spatial variability was treated at 2.32 m2 resolution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RI-NFOA midseason rate after 67 kg N ha−1 preplant nitrogen achieved 65% NUE.

Treatment
67 kg N ha−1 preplant applicatione0
Outcome
N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Value
65%e0
Comparator
134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate split appliede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the 67 kg N ha−1 preplant application, midseason RI-NFOA-based N rates resulted in an N use efficiency (NUE) of 65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–720 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the 134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate split applied had 56% NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 134 kg N ha−1 split fixed rate achieved 56% NUE.

Treatment
134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate split appliede0
Outcome
NUEe0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
RI-NFOA-based N ratese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the 134 kg N ha−1 fixed rate split applied had 56% NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“midseason RI-NFOA-based N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.32 m2 resolution, RICV-NFOA produced higher NUE.

Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.32 m2e0
Comparator
0.34e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the RICV-NFOA, NUE and net returns to N fertilizer were higher when spatial variability was treated at 2.32 m2 resolution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–911 · show in text ↑
e1

“two resolutions (0.34 and 2.32 m2) tested for RICV-NFOA only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.32 m2 resolution, RICV-NFOA produced higher net returns to N fertilizer.

Outcome
net returns to N fertilizere0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.32 m2e0
Comparator
0.34e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the RICV-NFOA, NUE and net returns to N fertilizer were higher when spatial variability was treated at 2.32 m2 resolution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–911 · show in text ↑
e1

“two resolutions (0.34 and 2.32 m2) tested for RICV-NFOA only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑