Paper · 2007 · Agro-Science

Aspects of tomato fruit quality as influenced by cultivar and scheme of fertilizer appication

G O Oko-Ibom; J E Asiegbu

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The fruit quality characteristics of eight tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars namely; UN-83, Nsukka Local, Roma VFN, Ronita, Ife-1, Rossol, NHle 7-7-1 and Ace VF were assessed under seven fertilizer application schemes in two field experiments at Nsukka, Southeast Nigeria. The tomato cultivars, UN-83, Roma VFN and Ronita excelled in most of the fruit quality characteristics studied, especially, resistance to cracking, low seed content, firmness, percent titratable acidity and soluble solids and, longer shelf life. On the average, fertilizer application at two weeks after transplanting either in single dose or in two splits with the second split applied at flowering, gave better fruit quality characteristics than the other application schedules except the two split application with one- half at transplanting and one- half at flowering. Keywords: Tomato, Fruit quality, Fertilizer, Lycopersicon esculentum > Agro-Science Vol. 6 (1) 2007: pp. 71-81

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato cultivars UN-83, Roma VFN and Ronita excelled in most fruit quality characteristics.

Material
UN-83, Roma VFN and Ronitae0
Outcome
fruit quality characteristicse0
Direction
excellede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato cultivars, UN-83, Roma VFN and Ronita excelled in most of the fruit quality characteristics studied, especially, resistance to cracking, low seed content, firmness, percent titratable acidity and soluble solids and, longer shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application at two weeks after transplanting gave better fruit quality than the other application schedules in tomato.

Treatment
fertilizer application at two weeks after transplantinge1
Outcome
fruit quality characteristicse1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
except the two split application with one- half at transplanting and one- half at floweringe3
Comparator
other application schedulese1
Setting
Nsukka, Southeast Nigeriae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato cultivars, UN-83, Roma VFN and Ronita excelled in most of the fruit quality characteristics studied, especially, resistance to cracking, low seed content, firmness, percent titratable acidity and soluble solids and, longer shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizer application at two weeks after transplanting either in single dose or in two splits with the second split applied at flowering, gave better fruit quality characteristics than the other application schedules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–767 · show in text ↑
e2

“in two field experiments at Nsukka, Southeast Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–286 · show in text ↑
e3

“except the two split application with one- half at transplanting and one- half at flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–859 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 40 positive, 13 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.