Paper · 2024 · Journal of Food and Agriculture

Impact of Transplants Age on the Nutritional Quality of Cherry Tomatoes

M. F. Hossain; M. S. Islam

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The age of transplants for planting in a local environment is important for better quality cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) production. A field experiment was conducted during the winter (October 2023 to March 2024) to evaluate the effect of transplant age at the time of planting on fruit quality parameters (total soluble solids (TSS), moisture, ash, fiber, fat, pH, and vitamin C) in two cherry tomato varieties: BARI tomato-11 (red-coloured fruits) and Philippines variety (yellow-coloured fruits). Cherry tomato plants were cultivated at four different transplant ages (21, 28, 35, and 42 days old) on the same day, and fruit quality parameters were measured in the ripe fruits. According to the results, there was a significant difference in all the studied fruit quality parameters, except for moisture content, among transplants of different ages, irrespective of variety. The TSS in fruit juice was higher (6.45) in 28-day-old transplants than in transplants of other ages. The vitamin C content in fruit pulp was higher (16.71 mg/100 mL) in 28-day-old transplants, which was statistically similar to that of fruits from 21-day-old transplants. Fat (0.20%) and ash (1.54%) contents in fruits were higher in 35-day-old transplants while the fruit fiber content (0.85%) was higher in 28-day-old transplants, which was statistically similar to that of 35-day-old transplants. Moreover, fruit quality parameters were significantly different between the varieties, except for TSS and moisture content. The BARI tomato-11 variety (red-coloured fruits) was more acidic (pH value of 4.03) and contained higher contents of ash (1.47%), fiber (0.85%), and vitamin C (16.56 mg/100 mL) than the Philippines variety (yellow-coloured fruits), irrespective of transplant age. Hence, it can be concluded that 28-day-old cherry tomato transplants are suitable for producing better quality fruits (higher TSS, fiber, and vitamin C contents).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant age significantly affected all studied fruit quality parameters except moisture.

Treatment
transplants of different agese1
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse1
Qualifier
except for moisture contente1
Comparator
transplants of different agese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a significant difference in all the studied fruit quality parameters, except for moisture content, among transplants of different ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit juice TSS was highest at 28 days (6.45).

Treatment
28-day-old transplantse1
Outcome
TSS in fruit juicee1
Direction
highere1
Value
6.45e1
Comparator
transplants of other agese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The TSS in fruit juice was higher (6.45) in 28-day-old transplants than in transplants of other ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pulp vitamin C was higher at 28 days (16.71 mg/100 mL), statistically similar to 21 days.

Treatment
28-day-old transplantse1
Outcome
vitamin C content in fruit pulpe1
Direction
highere1
Value
16.71 mg/100 mLe1
Qualifier
statistically similare1
Comparator
21-day-old transplantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vitamin C content in fruit pulp was higher (16.71 mg/100 mL) in 28-day-old transplants, which was statistically similar to that of fruits from 21-day-old transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit fat content was higher at 35 days (0.20%).

Treatment
35-day-old transplantse1
Outcome
Fate1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fat (0.20%) and ash (1.54%) contents in fruits were higher in 35-day-old transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit ash content was higher at 35 days (1.54%).

Treatment
35-day-old transplantse1
Outcome
ashe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.54%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fat (0.20%) and ash (1.54%) contents in fruits were higher in 35-day-old transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit fiber content was higher at 28 days (0.85%), statistically similar to 35 days.

Treatment
28-day-old transplantse1
Outcome
fruit fiber contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.85%e1
Comparator
35-day-old transplantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit fiber content (0.85%) was higher in 28-day-old transplants, which was statistically similar to that of 35-day-old transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality differed significantly between varieties except TSS and moisture.

Outcome
fruit quality parameterse1
Qualifier
except for TSS and moisture contente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality parameters were significantly different between the varieties, except for TSS and moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI tomato-11 fruit was more acidic than Philippines variety, with pH 4.03.

Material
BARI tomato-11e1
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
more acidice1
Value
4.03e1
Comparator
Philippines varietye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BARI tomato-11 variety (red-coloured fruits) was more acidic (pH value of 4.03) and contained higher contents of ash (1.47%), fiber (0.85%), and vitamin C (16.56 mg/100 mL) than the Philippines variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI tomato-11 fruit had higher ash content (1.47%) than Philippines variety.

Material
BARI tomato-11e1
Outcome
ashe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.47%e1
Comparator
Philippines varietye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BARI tomato-11 variety (red-coloured fruits) was more acidic (pH value of 4.03) and contained higher contents of ash (1.47%), fiber (0.85%), and vitamin C (16.56 mg/100 mL) than the Philippines variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI tomato-11 fruit had higher fiber content (0.85%) than Philippines variety.

Material
BARI tomato-11e1
Outcome
fibere1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.85%e1
Comparator
Philippines varietye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BARI tomato-11 variety (red-coloured fruits) was more acidic (pH value of 4.03) and contained higher contents of ash (1.47%), fiber (0.85%), and vitamin C (16.56 mg/100 mL) than the Philippines variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI tomato-11 fruit had higher vitamin C content (16.56 mg/100 mL) than Philippines variety.

Material
BARI tomato-11e1
Outcome
vitamin Ce1
Direction
highere1
Value
16.56 mg/100 mLe1
Comparator
Philippines varietye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–144 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BARI tomato-11 variety (red-coloured fruits) was more acidic (pH value of 4.03) and contained higher contents of ash (1.47%), fiber (0.85%), and vitamin C (16.56 mg/100 mL) than the Philippines variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1732 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 28-day-old transplants for better quality cherry tomato fruit.

Outcome
28-day-old cherry tomato transplants are suitable for producing better quality fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“28-day-old cherry tomato transplants are suitable for producing better quality fruits (higher TSS, fiber, and vitamin C contents)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1952 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

transplanting · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.