Paper · 2004

Do nutrient uptakes and grain yields differ between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming as mono-crop and in mixture Characteristics of spring barley varieties for organic farming

Niels Erik Nielsen; scientist Ingrid Kaag Thomsen; Scientist Jørgen Berntsen

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Manure application increased yield. Hence the study was conducted under the conditions of moderate nutrient stress and in all probability nitrogen stress. Under this condition nutrient uptakes, biomass production and grain yields did vary between Otira, Orthega, Landora, Brazil, Svani, NK96-300, Mixture 1 (Otira, Orthega, Landora) and Mixture 2 (Brazil, Svani and NK96-300). Interaction between variety and soil fertility treatments were also significant. These findings open new possibilities for selection or plant breeding for genotypes with improved capability of nutrient acquisition from soils at different soil fertility levels e.g. in organic farming. Cropping of barley varieties in mixtures seems to increase (stimulate) nutrient uptakes (N, P, S, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Zn, Cu and Mo) and biomass production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application increased barley yield.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
t0

“between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley nutrient uptakes differed among the named varieties and mixtures under moderate nutrient stress.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Otira, Orthega, Landora, Brazil, Svani, NK96-300, Mixture 1 (Otira, Orthega, Landora) and Mixture 2 (Brazil, Svani and NK96-300)e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakese0
Direction
did varye0
Qualifier
Under this conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under this condition nutrient uptakes, biomass production and grain yields did vary between Otira, Orthega, Landora, Brazil, Svani, NK96-300, Mixture 1 (Otira, Orthega, Landora) and Mixture 2 (Brazil, Svani and NK96-300)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley biomass production differed among the named varieties and mixtures.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
did varye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under this condition nutrient uptakes, biomass production and grain yields did vary between Otira, Orthega, Landora, Brazil, Svani, NK96-300, Mixture 1 (Otira, Orthega, Landora) and Mixture 2 (Brazil, Svani and NK96-300)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yields differed among the named varieties and mixtures.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
did varye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under this condition nutrient uptakes, biomass production and grain yields did vary between Otira, Orthega, Landora, Brazil, Svani, NK96-300, Mixture 1 (Otira, Orthega, Landora) and Mixture 2 (Brazil, Svani and NK96-300)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and soil fertility treatment interacted significantly.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
soil fertility treatmentse0
Outcome
Interaction between variety and soil fertility treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction between variety and soil fertility treatments were also significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“between spring barley varieties grown for organic farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping barley varieties in mixtures seemed to increase nutrient uptake.

Treatment
Cropping of barley varieties in mixturese0
Outcome
nutrient uptakes (N, P, S, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Zn, Cu and Mo)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cropping of barley varieties in mixtures seems to increase (stimulate) nutrient uptakes (N, P, S, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Zn, Cu and Mo) and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping barley varieties in mixtures seemed to increase biomass production.

Treatment
Cropping of barley varieties in mixturese0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cropping of barley varieties in mixtures seems to increase (stimulate) nutrient uptakes (N, P, S, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Zn, Cu and Mo) and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–812 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.