Paper · 2008 · Weed Biology and Management

Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean

C. DOUGLAS BOYETTE; ROBERT E. HOAGLAND; MARK A. WEAVER

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots. Colletotrichum truncatum and glyphosate were applied in all pair‐wise combinations of 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 × 10 6 spores mL −1 (i.e. 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 × 10 11 spores ha −1 ), and 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, and 1.2 kg ha −1 , respectively. Weed control and disease incidence were enhanced at the two lowest fungal and herbicidal rates when the fungal spores were applied after glyphosate treatment. The application of the fungus in combination with or prior to glyphosate application at 0.30 kg ha −1 resulted in reduced disease incidence and weed control regardless of the inoculum's concentration. At the highest glyphosate rates, the weeds were controlled by the herbicide alone. These results suggest that it might be possible to utilize additive or synergistic herbicide and pathogen interactions to enhance hemp sesbania control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control improved with low dose fungus applied after glyphosate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Treatment
fungal spores were applied after glyphosate treatmente0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
two lowest fungal and herbicidal ratese0
Setting
field plotse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control and disease incidence were enhanced at the two lowest fungal and herbicidal rates when the fungal spores were applied after glyphosate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

disease incidence improved with low dose fungus applied after glyphosate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Treatment
fungal spores were applied after glyphosate treatmente0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
two lowest fungal and herbicidal ratese0
Setting
field plotse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control and disease incidence were enhanced at the two lowest fungal and herbicidal rates when the fungal spores were applied after glyphosate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

disease incidence was reduced when fungus was combined with or preceded glyphosate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Treatment
fungus in combination with or prior to glyphosate application at 0.30 kg ha −1e0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
field plotse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the fungus in combination with or prior to glyphosate application at 0.30 kg ha −1 resulted in reduced disease incidence and weed control regardless of the inoculum's concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

weed control was reduced when fungus was combined with or preceded glyphosate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Treatment
fungus in combination with or prior to glyphosate application at 0.30 kg ha −1e0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
field plotse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the fungus in combination with or prior to glyphosate application at 0.30 kg ha −1 resulted in reduced disease incidence and weed control regardless of the inoculum's concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest glyphosate rates alone controlled weeds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Treatment
highest glyphosate ratese0
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
weeds were controllede0
Setting
field plotse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the highest glyphosate rates, the weeds were controlled by the herbicide alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest additive or synergistic herbicide and pathogen interactions for sesbania control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Roundup Ready soybeane1
Interactor
hemp sesbaniat0weed
Second interactor
Colletotrichum truncatumColletotrichum truncatume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
utilize additive or synergistic herbicide and pathogen interactions to enhance hemp sesbania controle0
Setting
field plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that it might be possible to utilize additive or synergistic herbicide and pathogen interactions to enhance hemp sesbania control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Interaction of a bioherbicide and glyphosate for controlling hemp sesbania in glyphosate‐resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioherbicidal fungus, Colletotrichum truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, was tested at different inoculum concentrations alone and in combination with, prior to or following treatment with different rates of glyphosate ( N ‐[phosphonomethyl]glycine) (Roundup Ultra) for the control of hemp sesbania ( Sesbania exaltata [Raf.] Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) in Roundup Ready soybean field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 42 positive, 14 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.