Abstract
Abstract Midsummer grapehoeing following spring application of diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] or simazine [2-chloro-4,6- bis (ethylamino)- s -triazine] plus paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium ion) adequately controlled weeds growing in grapes ( Vitis labrusca L.). When grapehoeing was used to control grape root borer [( Vitacea polistiformis Harris) lower initial rates of preemergence herbicide could be used. An additional half-rate of herbicide was required after grapehoeing to maintain weed control through the fall. Plots not grapehoed were almost completely weed free following a glyphosate [ N -(phosphonomethyl)glycine] treatment. Injury to grapes the following spring was associated with fall glyphosate applications where low hanging foliage, that had not been removed, intercepted the spray. Glyphosate was most effective and paraquat more effective than dinoseb (2- sec -buty1-4,6-dinitrophenol) plus diesel fuel for postemergence control of weeds in grapes. Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Midsummer grapehoeing after spring diuron or simazine plus paraquat controlled weeds in grapes.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- Midsummer grapehoeinge0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- weeds growing in grapese0
- Direction
- adequately controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Midsummer grapehoeing following spring application of diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] or simazine [2-chloro-4,6- bis (ethylamino)- s -triazine] plus paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium ion) adequately controlled weeds growing in grapes ( Vitis labrusca L.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Grapehoeing for grape root borer allowed lower initial preemergence herbicide rates.
Verbatim
e0“When grapehoeing was used to control grape root borer [( Vitacea polistiformis Harris) lower initial rates of preemergence herbicide could be used.”
Claim · model-written summary
An additional half-rate of herbicide after grapehoeing maintained weed control through fall.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Treatment
- An additional half-rate of herbicidee0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- maintaine0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“An additional half-rate of herbicide was required after grapehoeing to maintain weed control through the fall.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate left plots without grapehoeing almost completely weed free.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Plots not grapehoed were almost completely weed free following a glyphosate [ N -(phosphonomethyl)glycine] treatment.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall glyphosate applications were associated with grape injury the following spring when retained low foliage intercepted spray.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- fall glyphosate applicationse0
- Outcome
- Injury to grapese0
- Qualifier
- low hanging foliage, that had not been removed, intercepted the spraye0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Injury to grapes the following spring was associated with fall glyphosate applications where low hanging foliage, that had not been removed, intercepted the spray.”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate was most effective for postemergence weed control in grapes.
- Taxon
- grapese0
- Treatment
- Glyphosatee0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- postemergence control of weedse0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Glyphosate was most effective and paraquat more effective than dinoseb (2- sec -buty1-4,6-dinitrophenol) plus diesel fuel for postemergence control of weeds in grapes.”
Claim · model-written summary
Paraquat was more effective than dinoseb plus diesel fuel for postemergence weed control.
Verbatim
e0“paraquat more effective than dinoseb (2- sec -buty1-4,6-dinitrophenol) plus diesel fuel for postemergence control of weeds in grapes.”
Claim · model-written summary
napropamide was effective as a residual treatment.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
norflurazon was effective as a residual treatment.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
oxadiazon was effective as a residual treatment.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
oryzalin was effective as a residual treatment.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.”
t0“Grapes”
Claim · model-written summary
oxyfluorfen was effective as a residual treatment.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence herbicides, napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxy)- N , N -diethylpropionamide], norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m -tolyl)-3(2 H )-pyridazinone], oxadiazon [2- tert -buty1-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-∆ 2 -l,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one], oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene], were effective as residual type treatments.”
t0“Grapes”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · weed · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
herbicide · weed · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.