Paper · 2009 · Agronomy Journal

Linking Wisconsin Dairy and Grain Farms via Manure Transfer for Corn Production

Gregg R. Sanford; Amy R. Cook; Josh L. Posner; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One relatively under‐used manure management strategy employed by dairy farmers is to transport and apply manure onto the fields of nearby grain farmers. While this system offers advantages to both parties, little of the existing research on manure management has been conducted on grain farms. As part of an effort to link grain and livestock farms in southern Wisconsin, 20 on‐farm trials were conducted to study the agronomic and environmental effects of including manure in cash‐grain rotations. Manure was applied at a rate of approximately 107 m 3 ha −1 as slurry (11,000 gal acre −1 ) or 54 Mg ha −1 (24 ton acre −1 ) as a solid. Across‐site analysis indicated that the manured treatment increased corn ( Zea mays L.) yields significantly (alpha = 0.05), by 0.5 Mg ha −1 (11.5 vs. 11.0 Mg ha −1 ), with 67 kg ha −1 less purchased fertilizer N during the 3 yr of this study. However, there were environmental concerns: (i) Early fall manure spreading significantly increased fall nitrate (NO 3 ) levels in the manured plots (175 vs. 87 kg NO 3 –N ha −1 ); (ii) Following corn harvest, fall NO 3 levels were fairly low and equivalent between treatments with the exception of three sites where manuring resulted in significantly higher NO 3 –N; and (iii) Soil tests following corn harvest indicated a significant increase in soil test phosphorus (STP) on the manured plots. These results indicate that dairy manure can reduce fertilizer inputs although there is a risk of NO 3 –N leaching and P accumulation. Informal interviews were conducted with farmer‐participants following this study to asses current manure use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased corn yield significantly by 0.5 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
manured treatmente0
Outcome
corn ( Zea mays L.) yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.5 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
11.5 vs. 11.0 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the manured treatment increased corn ( Zea mays L.) yields significantly (alpha = 0.05), by 0.5 Mg ha −1 (11.5 vs. 11.0 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manured plots used 67 kg ha −1 less purchased fertilizer nitrogen.

Outcome
purchased fertilizer Ne0
Direction
lesse0
Value
67 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with 67 kg ha −1 less purchased fertilizer N during the 3 yr of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early fall manure spreading significantly raised fall nitrate levels.

Treatment
Early fall manure spreadinge0
Outcome
fall nitrate (NO 3 ) levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
175 vs. 87 kg NO 3 –N ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early fall manure spreading significantly increased fall nitrate (NO 3 ) levels in the manured plots (175 vs. 87 kg NO 3 –N ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest fall nitrate levels were low and equivalent between treatments except at three sites.

Outcome
fall NO 3 levelse0
Direction
equivalente0
Qualifier
with the exception of three sitese0
Comparator
between treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following corn harvest, fall NO 3 levels were fairly low and equivalent between treatments with the exception of three sites where manuring resulted in significantly higher NO 3 –N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At three sites, manure significantly raised postharvest nitrate nitrogen.

Treatment
manuringe0
Outcome
NO 3 –Ne0
Direction
highere0
Setting
three sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three sites where manuring resulted in significantly higher NO 3 –N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure significantly increased postharvest soil test phosphorus.

Treatment
manured plotse0
Outcome
soil test phosphorus (STP)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil tests following corn harvest indicated a significant increase in soil test phosphorus (STP) on the manured plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.