Paper · 1992 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Nitrogen Fertilizer and Dairy Manure Effects on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrate

William E. Jokela

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
192
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Manure from livestock is an important source of N for crop production in many areas, but efficient management of manure is critical to improve the economics of manure use and to minimize the impact on water quality. A field study was conducted on an Enosburg fine sandy loam (sandy over loamy, mixed, nonacid, mesic Mollic Haplaquent) in northwestern Vermont to evaluate the effect of dairy‐manure and N‐fertilizer application on corn ( Zea mays L.) yields and soil profile NO 3 in a silage production system. Treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of manure (0 and 9 Mg ha ‐1 , dry‐matter basis), N rate (56 and 112 kg ha ‐1 as NH 4 NO 3 ), and time of N application (planting or six‐leaf stage), as well as 0 and 168 kg N ha ‐1 rate at planting (with and without manure). Yields and N uptake were increased by N fertilizer and by manure. Without manure, grain and silage yields were increased by fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha ‐1 rate in all years; with manure, N fertilizer did not increase yields significantly. Time of application had little or no effect on yield. Plant uptake of N followed a similar pattern but with somewhat more pronounced effects. A presidedress NO 3 soil test reflected N availability, as indicated by relative yields. Manure application rates were equivalent, in terms of yield response, to 73 to 122 kg fertilizer N ha ‐1 in individual years, which represented 27 to 44% of the total manure N in the year of application. Sampling of the 1.5‐m soil profile before planting and after harvest showed increases in soil NO 3 that were related to the amounts of manure and fertilizer N applied. Some decreases in NO 3 were measured from fall to spring sampling times, but net losses were minimal where <60 kg ha ‐1 NO 3 ‐N was present in the fall. Application of manure resulted in similar or slightly lower soil profile NO 3 than agronomincally equivalent rates of fertilizer N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased corn yields.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yields and N uptake were increased by N fertilizer and by manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased corn yields.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yields and N uptake were increased by N fertilizer and by manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased corn N uptake.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yields and N uptake were increased by N fertilizer and by manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased corn N uptake.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yields and N uptake were increased by N fertilizer and by manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manure, fertilizer N increased grain yield through 112 kg ha ‐1 in all years.

Treatment
fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha ‐1 ratee0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Without manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Without manure, grain and silage yields were increased by fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha ‐1 rate in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manure, fertilizer N increased silage yield through 112 kg ha ‐1 in all years.

Treatment
fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha ‐1 ratee0
Outcome
silage yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Without manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Without manure, grain and silage yields were increased by fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha ‐1 rate in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With manure, N fertilizer did not significantly increase yields.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
with manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“with manure, N fertilizer did not increase yields significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of application had little or no yield effect.

Treatment
Time of applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little or no effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Time of application had little or no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant N uptake followed a similar pattern with more pronounced treatment effects.

Outcome
Plant uptake of Ne0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant uptake of N followed a similar pattern but with somewhat more pronounced effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1173 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presidedress soil nitrate testing reflected N availability as indicated by yield.

Outcome
N availabilitye0
Comparator
relative yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“A presidedress NO 3 soil test reflected N availability, as indicated by relative yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure rates gave a yield response equivalent to 73 to 122 kg fertilizer N ha ‐1.

Treatment
Manure application ratese0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
equivalente0
Value
73 to 122 kg fertilizer N ha ‐1e0
Qualifier
27 to 44% of the total manure Ne0
Comparator
fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure application rates were equivalent, in terms of yield response, to 73 to 122 kg fertilizer N ha ‐1 in individual years, which represented 27 to 44% of the total manure N in the year of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1466 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil profile nitrate increased with applied manure and fertilizer N amounts.

Treatment
manure and fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
soil NO 3e0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“increases in soil NO 3 that were related to the amounts of manure and fertilizer N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall-to-spring soil nitrate decreases were measured.

Outcome
NO 3e0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
fall to spring sampling timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Some decreases in NO 3 were measured from fall to spring sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net nitrate losses were minimal with under 60 kg ha ‐1 fall NO3-N.

Outcome
net lossese0
Direction
minimale0
Value
<60 kg ha ‐1 NO 3 ‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“net losses were minimal where <60 kg ha ‐1 NO 3 ‐N was present in the fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure gave similar or slightly lower soil nitrate than equivalent fertilizer N.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
soil profile NO 3e0
Direction
similar or slightly lowere0
Comparator
fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of manure resulted in similar or slightly lower soil profile NO 3 than agronomincally equivalent rates of fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1919 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.