Paper · 1992 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The influence of the form of nitrogen nutrition on uptake and distribution of cadmium in lettuce varieties

P. J. Florijn; J. A. Nelemans; M. L. van Beusichem

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Four lettuce (Lactuca saliva L.) varieties ('Benita’, ‘Wendy’, ‘Mirena’, and ‘Jacky') were grown for 43 days in a pH‐controlled complete nutrient solution without cadmium (Cd) or with either 0.01 or 0.03 mg Cd/1 and with NH4 or NO3 as the form of nitrogen nutrition. Cadmium did not affect dry matter yield. ‘Wendy’ had a significantly higher total dry matter production when grown on NO3 compared to NH4, whereas growth of ‘Mirena’ was best on NH4 (P<0.05). Dry weights of ‘Benita’ and ‘Jacky’ were not affected by the N source. Cadmium concentrations in shoots (and roots) of plants grown on NH4 were significantly higher than in plants grown on NO3. The Zn concentrations in the shoots were also enhanced. The distribution of Cd in the lettuce varieties was independent of the form of N nutrition. It is concluded that the N source directly affects the amount of Cd taken up, without influencing the Cd distribution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium did not affect lettuce dry matter yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Cadmiume0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium did not affect dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wendy produced significantly more total dry matter on NO3 than NH4.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
‘Wendy’e0
Treatment
NO3e0
Outcome
total dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NH4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Wendy’ had a significantly higher total dry matter production when grown on NO3 compared to NH4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mirena grew best on NH4.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
‘Mirena’e0
Treatment
NH4e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of ‘Mirena’ was best on NH4 (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benita dry weight was unaffected by nitrogen source.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
‘Benita’e0
Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
Dry weightse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weights of ‘Benita’ and ‘Jacky’ were not affected by the N source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jacky dry weight was unaffected by nitrogen source.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Material
‘Jacky’e0
Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
Dry weightse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weights of ‘Benita’ and ‘Jacky’ were not affected by the N source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NH4-grown lettuce had significantly higher cadmium concentrations in shoots and roots than NO3-grown plants.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
NH4e0
Outcome
Cadmium concentrations in shoots (and roots)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NO3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium concentrations in shoots (and roots) of plants grown on NH4 were significantly higher than in plants grown on NO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot zinc concentrations were enhanced under NH4 nutrition.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
NH4e1
Outcome
Zn concentrations in the shootse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
NO3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentrations in the shoots were also enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants grown on NH4 were significantly higher than in plants grown on NO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium distribution among lettuce varieties was independent of nitrogen form.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
form of N nutritione0
Outcome
distribution of Cde0
Direction
independente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of Cd in the lettuce varieties was independent of the form of N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–808 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.