Paper · 2013 · Kenyatta University Institutional Repository (Kenyatta University)

Effect of inoculating selected climbing bean cultivars with different rhizobia strains on nitrogen fixation

Richard Cheruiyot; Gibson Kamau Gicharu; Nkanata Mburugu Gitonga; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were designed to investigate biological nitrogen fixation in indeterminate (climbing) bean cultivars namely Cargamanto, NG224-4 and G59/1-2. Greenhouse and field studies were carried out to determine the most efficient bean cultivars and rhizobia strains in nitrogen fixation. Each cultivar was inoculated with the rhizobia strains CIAT 899, USDA 2674, USDA 2676, the three strains combined and one was not inoculated. There were no statistical differences in nodulation between the different inoculant treatments but in the field, beans inoculated with rhizobia strain USDA 2676 formed the highest nodule number. The bean cultivars inoculated with a mixture of the three rhizobia strains gave the highest total plant dry weight. Treatments within each of the cultivars showed differences in total plant dry weight yield in response to rhizobia strain used. Field experiments showed that plant dry weight differed significantly between cultivars but there were no significant differences in yields. Keywords: Climbing beans, rhizobium, nitrogen fixation, inoculation, Central Kenya.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation did not differ statistically among inoculant treatments.

Taxon
climbing beant0
Treatment
different inoculant treatmentse0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
no statistical differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistical differences in nodulation between the different inoculant treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“climbing bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USDA 2676 inoculated field beans formed the highest nodule number.

Taxon
beanse0
Treatment
inoculated with rhizobia strain USDA 2676e0
Interactor
rhizobia strain USDA 2676e0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the field, beans inoculated with rhizobia strain USDA 2676 formed the highest nodule number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans receiving the three-strain mixture had the highest dry weight.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
inoculated with a mixture of the three rhizobia strainse0
Interactor
rhizobia strainse0symbiont
Outcome
total plant dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The bean cultivars inoculated with a mixture of the three rhizobia strains gave the highest total plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant dry weight yield differed among rhizobial treatments within cultivars.

Taxon
climbing beant0
Treatment
rhizobia straine0
Interactor
rhizobia straine0symbiont
Outcome
total plant dry weight yielde0
Direction
differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments within each of the cultivars showed differences in total plant dry weight yield in response to rhizobia strain used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“climbing bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field plant dry weight differed significantly between cultivars.

Taxon
climbing beant0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments showed that plant dry weight differed significantly between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“climbing bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field yields did not differ significantly between cultivars.

Taxon
climbing beant0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterial

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“climbing bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.