Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Ecology

Intercropping effect on root growth and nitrogen uptake at different nitrogen levels

Javier Ramirez-Garcia; Helle J. Martens; Miguel Quemada; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
59
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Intercropping legumes and non-legumes may affect the root growth of both components in the mixture, and the non-legume is known to be strongly favored by increasing nitrogen (N) supply. The knowledge of how root systems affect the growth of the individual species is useful for understanding the interactions in intercrops as well as for planning cover cropping strategies. The aim of this work was (i) to determine if different levels of N in the topsoil influence root depth (RD) and intensity of barley and vetch as sole crops or as an intercropped mixture and (ii) to test if the choice of a mixture or the N availability in the topsoil will influence the N uptake by deep roots. In this study, we combined rhizotron studies with root extraction and species identification by microscopy with studies of growth, N uptake and 15N uptake from deeper soil layers, for studying the root interactions of root growth and N foraging for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and vetch (Vicia sativa L.), frequently grown in mixtures as cover crops. N was added at 0 (N0), 50 (N1) and 150 (N2) kg N ha−1. The roots discrimination relying on the anatomical and morphological differences observed between dicots and monocots proved to be a reliable method providing valuable data for the analysis. The intercrop and the barley attained slightly higher root intensity (RI) and RD than the vetch, with values around 150 crosses m−1 and 1.4 m, respectively, compared to 50 crosses m−1 and 0.9 m for the vetch. At deep soil layers, intercropping showed slightly larger RI values compared to the sole-cropped barley. The barley and the intercropping had larger root length density (RLD) values (200–600 m m−3) than the vetch (25–130) at 0.8–1.2 m depth. The topsoil N supply did not show a clear effect on the RI, RD or RLD; however, increasing topsoil N favored the proliferation of vetch roots in the intercropping at deep soil layers, with the barley:vetch root ratio ranging from 25 at N0 to 5 at N2. The N uptake of the barley was enhanced in the intercropping at the expense of the vetch (from ~100mg plant−1 to 200). The intercropped barley roots took up more labeled nitrogen (0.6mg 15N plant−1) than the sole-cropped barley roots (0.3mg 15N plant−1) from deep layers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anatomical root discrimination was reliable.

Taxon
dicots and monocotse0
Outcome
reliable methode0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The roots discrimination relying on the anatomical and morphological differences observed between dicots and monocots proved to be a reliable method providing valuable data for the analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop and barley had greater root intensity and depth than vetch.

Outcome
higher root intensity (RI) and RDe0
Comparator
vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercrop and the barley attained slightly higher root intensity (RI) and RD than the vetch, with values around 150 crosses m−1 and 1.4 m, respectively, compared to 50 crosses m−1 and 0.9 m for the vetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-layer root intensity was greater in intercrop than sole barley.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
RI valuese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
sole-cropped barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At deep soil layers, intercropping showed slightly larger RI values compared to the sole-cropped barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley and intercrop root length density exceeded vetch at 0.8–1.2 m.

Outcome
root length density (RLD)e0
Direction
largere0
Value
200–600 m m−3e0
Comparator
vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The barley and the intercropping had larger root length density (RLD) values (200–600 m m−3) than the vetch (25–130) at 0.8–1.2 m depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsoil nitrogen supply showed no clear effect on root intensity, depth, or density.

Treatment
topsoil N supplye0
Outcome
RI, RD or RLDe0
Direction
did not show a clear effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The topsoil N supply did not show a clear effect on the RI, RD or RLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing topsoil nitrogen favored deep vetch root proliferation in intercrop.

Taxon
vetche0
Treatment
increasing topsoil Ne0
Outcome
proliferation of vetch rootse0
Direction
favorede0
Value
25 at N0 to 5 at N2e0
Comparator
N0e0

Verbatim

e0

“increasing topsoil N favored the proliferation of vetch roots in the intercropping at deep soil layers, with the barley:vetch root ratio ranging from 25 at N0 to 5 at N2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping enhanced barley nitrogen uptake at vetch expense.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
N uptake of the barleye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N uptake of the barley was enhanced in the intercropping at the expense of the vetch (from ~100mg plant−1 to 200).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped barley absorbed more labeled nitrogen from deep layers than sole barley.

Treatment
intercropped barleye0
Outcome
labeled nitrogene0
Direction
moree0
Value
0.6mg 15N plant−1e0
Comparator
sole-cropped barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped barley roots took up more labeled nitrogen (0.6mg 15N plant−1) than the sole-cropped barley roots (0.3mg 15N plant−1) from deep layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2254 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

110 papers: 66 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.