Abstract
Starting from semihardwood branches of peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5, plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera × P. salicina) × (P. cerasifera × P. persica) cv. Ishtarà and olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio, cuttings were collected and treated with 0 mg.L-1 and 2500 mg.L-1 of indolebutyric acid (IBA) by immersion in the base of the cuttings. After 60 days of planting, the cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtarà and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively), inducing a higher number of roots per cutting without at the same time significantly increasing the length of the roots themselves. The levels of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate in the rooted and non-rooted cuttings of the three cultivars were determined. These parameters varied in function of the consistency of the cuttings from each species, but showed a positive correlation between the increase of the rooting and the increase of the ascorbate in the reduced form.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
IBA increased rooting induction in MRS 2/5 by 27.5%.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera E.
Prunus cerasiferat0 - Material
- MRS 2/5e0
- Treatment
- application of the indolebutyric acide0
- Outcome
- rooting inductione0
- Value
- 27.5e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtarà and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively)”
t0“peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA increased rooting induction in Ishtarà by 47.5%.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera × P. salicinaPrunus cerasiferat0
- Material
- Ishtaràe0
- Treatment
- application of the indolebutyric acide0
- Outcome
- rooting inductione0
- Value
- 47.5e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtarà and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively)”
t0“plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera × P. salicina) × (P. cerasifera × P. persica) cv. Ishtarà”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA increased rooting induction in Frantoio by 41.25%.
- Taxon
- Olea europaea L.
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Frantoioe0
- Treatment
- application of the indolebutyric acide0
- Outcome
- rooting inductione0
- Value
- 41.25 %e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cultivars MRS 2/5, Ishtarà and Frantoio presented a significative difference with relation to the rooting induction by application of the indolebutyric acid (27.5, 47.5 and 41.25 %, respectively)”
t0“olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cv. Frantoio”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA increased roots per cutting without significantly increasing root length.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera E.Prunus cerasiferat0
- Outcome
- number of roots per cuttinge0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inducing a higher number of roots per cutting without at the same time significantly increasing the length of the roots themselves”
t0“peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA did not significantly increase root length.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera E.Prunus cerasiferat0
- Outcome
- length of the rootse0
- Direction
- without at the same time significantly increasinge0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“without at the same time significantly increasing the length of the roots themselves”
t0“peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting consistency affected ascorbate and dehydroascorbate levels.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera E.Prunus cerasiferat0
- Organ / stage
- cuttingse0
- Outcome
- These parameterse0
- Direction
- variede0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These parameters varied in function of the consistency of the cuttings from each species”
t0“peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5”
Claim · model-written summary
Rooting and reduced ascorbate increased together.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera E.Prunus cerasiferat0
- Outcome
- increase of the rootinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- ascorbate in the reduced forme0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“showed a positive correlation between the increase of the rooting and the increase of the ascorbate in the reduced form”
t0“peach and plum rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera E.) cv. MRS2/5”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus cerasifera (cherry plum)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.