Paper · 2015 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Comparison of point injection and top-dressing application of nitrogen fertilizers with sulphur addition in winter rape (Brassica napus L.) in the Czech Republic

Lucie Peklova; Jindrich Cerny; Zuzana Peklova; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

In this paper, we are analyzing the yield and yield parameters of winter rape, fertilized using CULTAN system (Controlled Uptake Long Term Ammonium Nutrition) in comparison with top-dressing application of nitrogen fertilizers, which were studied on Haplic Luvisol over 5 years. No significant differences in seed yields between the two systems of fertilization were observed in 2008, 2009 and 2011. The effect of sulphur on a higher seed yield was proved in 2010 and 2012. The seed yield was higher by 11.4% in the treatments with sulphur amendment regardless of the system of fertilization in 2010. The seed yield was higher by 18.2 % in the CULTAN treatment with sulphur adittion in comparison to CULTAN treatment with no sulphur added in 2012. Nitrogen supply was ample in the first flowers open growth stage of winter rape in 2009, 2010 and 2012. The plant height was significantly lower after CULTAN method and as well as higher values of 1000 seed weight were recorded in comparison to top-dressing application in 2009. Nitrogen uptake by seed dry matter was the highest in the year 2009, which corresponds to the achieved seed yields this year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CULTAN and top-dressing had no significant seed yield difference in 2008, 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
two systems of fertilizatione0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Qualifier
2008, 2009 and 2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant differences in seed yields between the two systems of fertilization were observed in 2008, 2009 and 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur amendment increased seed yield by 11.4% in 2010.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
sulphur amendmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.4%e0
Qualifier
in 2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The seed yield was higher by 11.4% in the treatments with sulphur amendment regardless of the system of fertilization in 2010.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur addition in CULTAN increased seed yield by 18.2% relative to CULTAN without sulphur in 2012.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
CULTAN treatment with sulphur adittione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.2 %e0
Qualifier
in 2012e0
Comparator
CULTAN treatment with no sulphur addede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The seed yield was higher by 18.2 % in the CULTAN treatment with sulphur adittion in comparison to CULTAN treatment with no sulphur added in 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply was ample at first flowers open in 2009, 2010 and 2012.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napuse0
Organ / stage
first flowers open growth stagee0
Outcome
Nitrogen supplye0
Qualifier
2009, 2010 and 2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen supply was ample in the first flowers open growth stage of winter rape in 2009, 2010 and 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CULTAN significantly lowered plant height versus top-dressing in 2009.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
CULTAN methode0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in 2009e0
Comparator
top-dressing applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height was significantly lower after CULTAN method and as well as higher values of 1000 seed weight were recorded in comparison to top-dressing application in 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CULTAN increased 1000 seed weight relative to top-dressing in 2009.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
CULTAN methode0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in 2009e0
Comparator
top-dressing applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height was significantly lower after CULTAN method and as well as higher values of 1000 seed weight were recorded in comparison to top-dressing application in 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by seed dry matter was highest in 2009.

Outcome
Nitrogen uptake by seed dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the year 2009e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake by seed dry matter was the highest in the year 2009, which corresponds to the achieved seed yields this year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1152 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

other · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.