Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CULTAN and top-dressing had no significant seed yield difference in 2008, 2009 and 2011.

A claim from Comparison of point injection and top-dressing application of nitrogen fertilizers with sulphur addition in winter rape (Brassica napus L.) in the Czech Republic · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CULTAN and top-dressing had no significant seed yield difference in 2008, 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
winter rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
two systems of fertilizatione0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Qualifier
2008, 2009 and 2011e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119
e0

“No significant differences in seed yields between the two systems of fertilization were observed in 2008, 2009 and 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–399

Title

Comparison of point injection and top-dressing application of nitrogen fertilizers with sulphur addition in winter rape (Brassica napus L.) in the Czech Republic

Lucie Peklova; Jindrich Cerny; Zuzana Peklova; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2015. doi:10.5513/jcea01/16.1.1574

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5bfbeab41bc3fd9666fc5b6cb8029f6f2c0a8065069011eaf1099b20979569ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.