Paper · 2008 · Hereditas

Breeding potential of durum wheat landraces from Jordan

A. A. JARADAT

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A Jordanian durum wheat collection consisting of 132 landraces was evaluated in an arid and a semiarid location for 21 morphological and developmental traits. Phenotypic diversity indices (H') were calculated for traits, districts, and regions of collection. Average diversity for Jordan was 0.675 ± 0.05. The pattern of variation of individual traits varied among districts and among regions. Polymorphism was high for waxiness (H' = 0.95), lodging resistance (0.91), stem solidness (0.86), glume color (0.80), and fertility of the basal floret (0.80). However, H' estimates were relatively low for early growth vigor (0.49), seed color (0.44) and juvenile growth habit (0.19). A clinal pattern was observed for resistance to common bunt, Tillelia foetiila (H' = 0.73), stripe rust, Puccinia striiformis (H' = 0.74), and powdery mildew, Erysiphe graminis f.sp. tritici (H' = 0.63). The frequency of resistant entries increased from the xeric south to the mesic north. Average diversity for developmental traits (i.e., days to heading, days to maturity, and filling period) was significantly higher in the semiarid (H'= 0.847 ± 0.05) than in the arid (H'= 0.658 ± 0.12) location. A hierarchical analysis of variance indicated that significant differences for H' estimates existed among regions and among districts within regions of collection. Landraces and districts with high frequency of agronom-ically desirable traits have been identified.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average phenotypic diversity in the Jordanian durum wheat collection was 0.675 ± 0.05.

Material
landracest0
Outcome
Average diversitye0
Value
0.675 ± 0.05e0
Setting
Jordane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average diversity for Jordan was 0.675 ± 0.05.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Patterns of individual trait variation differed among districts and regions.

Outcome
pattern of variation of individual traitse0
Setting
districts and among regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pattern of variation of individual traits varied among districts and among regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–393 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waxiness, lodging resistance, and stem solidness had high polymorphism, with diversity indices of 0.95, 0.91, and 0.86, respectively.

Outcome
Polymorphisme0
Value
H' = 0.95e0
Qualifier
lodging resistance (0.91), stem solidness (0.86)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Polymorphism was high for waxiness (H' = 0.95), lodging resistance (0.91), stem solidness (0.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glume color and basal floret fertility each had a high diversity index of 0.80.

Outcome
glume colore0
Value
0.80e0
Qualifier
fertility of the basal floret (0.80)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“glume color (0.80), and fertility of the basal floret (0.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early growth vigor, seed color, and juvenile growth habit had relatively low diversity indices of 0.49, 0.44, and 0.19.

Outcome
early growth vigore0
Value
0.49e0
Qualifier
seed color (0.44) and juvenile growth habit (0.19)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“H' estimates were relatively low for early growth vigor (0.49), seed color (0.44) and juvenile growth habit (0.19)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to common bunt displayed a clinal pattern.

Interactor
Tillelia foetiilae0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to common bunte0
Value
H' = 0.73e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“A clinal pattern was observed for resistance to common bunt, Tillelia foetiila (H' = 0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–769 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to stripe rust displayed a clinal pattern.

Interactor
Puccinia striiformisPuccinia striiformise0pathogen
Outcome
stripe ruste0
Value
H' = 0.74e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis
Puccinia striiformis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“stripe rust, Puccinia striiformis (H' = 0.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–816 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to powdery mildew displayed a clinal pattern.

Interactor
Erysiphe graminis f.sp. triticiBlumeria graminis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Value
H' = 0.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“powdery mildew, Erysiphe graminis f.sp. tritici (H' = 0.63)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–881 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The frequency of resistant landrace entries increased from the xeric south to the mesic north.

Outcome
frequency of resistant entriese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
xeric south to the mesic northe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The frequency of resistant entries increased from the xeric south to the mesic north.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average diversity for developmental traits was significantly higher in the semiarid than in the arid location.

Outcome
Average diversity for developmental traitse0
Direction
highere0
Value
H'= 0.847 ± 0.05e0
Qualifier
H'= 0.658 ± 0.12e0
Comparator
aride0
Setting
semiaride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average diversity for developmental traits (i.e., days to heading, days to maturity, and filling period) was significantly higher in the semiarid (H'= 0.847 ± 0.05) than in the arid (H'= 0.658 ± 0.12) location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversity indices differed significantly among regions and among districts within regions.

Outcome
differences for H' estimatese0
Setting
regions and among districts within regions of collectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant differences for H' estimates existed among regions and among districts within regions of collection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study identified landraces and districts with high frequencies of agronomically desirable traits.

Outcome
high frequency of agronom-ically desirable traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Landraces and districts with high frequency of agronom-ically desirable traits have been identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1444 · show in text ↑