Paper · 1990 · Plant Cell & Environment

Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls: biophysical mechanism of altered growth

D. J. COSGROVE

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The biophysical basis for the changes in cell elongation rate during gravitropism was examined in aetiolated cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) hypocotyls. Bulk osmotic pressures on the two sides of the stem and in the epidermal cells were not altered during the early time course of gravitropism. By the pressure-probe technique, a small increase in turgor (0.3 bar, 30 kPa) was detected on the upper (inhibited) side, whereas there was a negligible decrease in turgor on the lower (stimulated) side. These small changes in turgor and water potential appeared to be indirect, passive consequences of the altered growth and the small resistance for water movement from the xylem, and indicated that the change in growth was principally due to changes in wall properties. The results indicate that the hydraulic conductance of the water-transport pathway was large (.25 h-1 bar-1) and the water potential difference supporting cell expansion was no greater than 0.3 bar (30 kPa). From pressure-block experiments, it appeared that upon gravitropic stimulation (1) the yield threshold of the lower half of the stem did not decrease and (2) the wall on the upper side of the stem was not made more rigid by a cross-linking process. Mechanical measurements of the stress/strain properties of the walls showed that the initial development of gravitropism did not involve an alteration of the mechanical behaviour of the isolated walls. Thus, gravitropism in cucumber hypocotyls occurs principally by an alteration of the wall relaxation process, without a necessary change in wall mechanical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk osmotic pressures on the two sides of the stem and in the epidermal cells were not altered in the early course of gravitropism.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
steme1
Outcome
Bulk osmotic pressurese1
Direction
not alterede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bulk osmotic pressures on the two sides of the stem and in the epidermal cells were not altered during the early time course of gravitropism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small turgor increase of 0.3 bar (30 kPa) was detected on the upper, inhibited side of the cucumber hypocotyl stem.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
turgore2
Direction
increasee2
Value
0.3 bar, 30 kPae2
Qualifier
upper (inhibited) sidee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“By the pressure-probe technique, a small increase in turgor (0.3 bar, 30 kPa) was detected on the upper (inhibited) side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A negligible turgor decrease was found on the lower, stimulated side of the cucumber hypocotyl stem.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
turgore3
Direction
negligible decreasee3
Qualifier
lower (stimulated) sidee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas there was a negligible decrease in turgor on the lower (stimulated) side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hydraulic conductance of the water-transport pathway in cucumber hypocotyls was large (.25 h-1 bar-1).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
hydraulic conductance of the water-transport pathwaye4
Direction
largee4
Value
.25 h-1 bar-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e4

“the hydraulic conductance of the water-transport pathway was large (.25 h-1 bar-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The water potential difference supporting cell expansion was no greater than 0.3 bar (30 kPa) in cucumber hypocotyls.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
water potential difference supporting cell expansione5
Direction
no greater thane5
Value
0.3 bar (30 kPa)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e5

“the water potential difference supporting cell expansion was no greater than 0.3 bar (30 kPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upon gravitropic stimulation the yield threshold of the lower half of the cucumber stem did not decrease.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
yield threshold of the lower half of the steme6
Direction
did not decreasee6
Qualifier
upon gravitropic stimulatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e6

“From pressure-block experiments, it appeared that upon gravitropic stimulation (1) the yield threshold of the lower half of the stem did not decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wall on the upper side of the cucumber stem was not made more rigid by a cross-linking process during gravitropic stimulation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
wall on the upper side of the steme7
Direction
was not made more rigide7
Qualifier
a cross-linking processe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e7

“the wall on the upper side of the stem was not made more rigid by a cross-linking process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial development of gravitropism did not alter the mechanical behaviour of isolated cucumber hypocotyl walls.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
mechanical behaviour of the isolated wallse7
Direction
did not involve an alteratione7
Qualifier
initial development of gravitropisme7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e7

“the initial development of gravitropism did not involve an alteration of the mechanical behaviour of the isolated walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1423 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Gravitropism in cucumber hypocotyls occurs mainly through an alteration of the wall relaxation process rather than a change in wall mechanical properties.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
gravitropisme7
Qualifier
an alteration of the wall relaxation processe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gravitropism of cucumber hypocotyls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e7

“gravitropism in cucumber hypocotyls occurs principally by an alteration of the wall relaxation process, without a necessary change in wall mechanical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1591 · show in text ↑