Paper · 2008 · http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/84820080102.pdf

Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates

G. Mohsenabadi; Mohammad Reza Jahansooz; Mohammad Reza Chaichi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the yield and quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare)–vetch (Vicia desycarpa) intercropping, a series of experiments were conducted at the Experimental Field of the College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, in Karaj (Iran) from 2003 to 2005. The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block with a split plot design and four replications. Three levels (0, 45 and 90 Kg N ha -1 ) of nitrogen fertilizer and three cropping systems (sole barley, sole vetch and barley-vetch intercropping) were allocated to the main and sub plots, respectively. The barley-vetch intercropping treatment had a replacement arrangement (50: 50) with single alternate rows. Land equivalent ratio (LER), was used to compare sole cropping with intercropping systems. Results showed the supremacy of intercropping of barley and vetch over single crops. Generally, increasing nitrogen fertilizer caused a decreasing trend in the biological efficiency of intercropping. The highest LER for grain was obtained in control (N fertilizer free) plots (LER= 1.145). Nitrogen fertilizer increased the forage yield, grain yield, crude protein content, and crude protein yield of barley and vetch in sole and intercrops. Nitrogen application increased water use efficiency. In this study, barley was the dominant crop. The intercropping vetch and barley had the highest productivity and crude protein yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping of barley and vetch was superior to single crops.

Taxon
barley and vetche1
Treatment
intercropping of barley and vetche1
Outcome
supremacye1
Direction
supremacye1
Comparator
single cropse1

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed the supremacy of intercropping of barley and vetch over single crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest LER for grain was in control (N fertilizer free) plots, at 1.145.

Outcome
LER for graine1
Value
1.145e1
Qualifier
control (N fertilizer free) plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest LER for grain was obtained in control (N fertilizer free) plots (LER= 1.145)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer decreased the biological efficiency of barley-vetch intercropping.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
biological efficiency of intercroppinge1
Direction
decreasing trende1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Generally, increasing nitrogen fertilizer caused a decreasing trend in the biological efficiency of intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased forage yield, grain yield and crude protein content of barley and vetch.

Taxon
barley and vetche1
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
forage yield, grain yield, crude protein contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Nitrogen fertilizer increased the forage yield, grain yield, crude protein content, and crude protein yield of barley and vetch in sole and intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased crude protein yield of barley and vetch.

Taxon
barley and vetche1
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
crude protein yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Nitrogen fertilizer increased the forage yield, grain yield, crude protein content, and crude protein yield of barley and vetch in sole and intercrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased water use efficiency.

Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nitrogen application increased water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley was the dominant crop in the barley-vetch intercrop.

Outcome
dominant crope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In this study, barley was the dominant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley-vetch intercropping had the highest productivity and crude protein yield.

Taxon
vetch and barleye1
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
productivity and crude protein yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The intercropping vetch and barley had the highest productivity and crude protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Barley-Vetch Intercrop at Different Nitrogen Rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.