Paper · 2011 · Weed Technology

Significance of Atrazine as a Tank-Mix Partner with Tembotrione

Martin M. Williams; Rick A. Boydston; R. Ed Peachey; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Manufacturers of several POST corn herbicides recommend tank-mixing their herbicides with atrazine to improve performance; however, future regulatory changes may place greater restrictions on atrazine use and limit its availability to growers. Our research objectives were to quantify the effects of tank-mixing atrazine with tembotrione compared to tembotrione alone on (1) weed control, (2) variability in weed control, and (3) sweet corn yield components and yield variability. Field studies were conducted for 2 yr each in Illinois, Oregon, Washington, and Ontario, Canada. Tembotrione at 31 g ha −1 was applied alone and with atrazine at 370 g ha −1 POST at the four- to five-collar stage of corn. The predominant weed species observed in the experiment were common to corn production, including large crabgrass, wild-proso millet, common lambsquarters, and velvetleaf. For nearly every weed species and species group, the addition of atrazine improved tembotrione performance by increasing mean levels of weed control 3 to 45% at 2 wk after treatment. Adding atrazine reduced variation (i.e., standard deviation) in control of the weed community by 45%. Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone. Additional restrictions or the complete loss of atrazine for use in corn will necessitate major changes in sweet corn weed management systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine improved mean weed control by 3 to 45% at two weeks.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
mean levels of weed controle0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
3 to 45%e0
Qualifier
2 wk after treatmente0
Comparator
Tembotrionet0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of atrazine improved tembotrione performance by increasing mean levels of weed control 3 to 45% at 2 wk after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tank-Mix Partner with Tembotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine reduced variation in weed community control by 45%.

Treatment
Adding atrazinee0
Interactor
weed communitye0weed
Outcome
variation (i.e., standard deviation) in control of the weed communitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
Tembotrionet0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding atrazine reduced variation (i.e., standard deviation) in control of the weed community by 45%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tank-Mix Partner with Tembotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine raised sweet corn ear number by 9% versus tembotrione alone.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
atrazine was applied with tembotrionee0
Outcome
ear numbere0
Direction
highere0
Value
9e0
Comparator
tembotrione alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine raised sweet corn ear mass by 13% versus tembotrione alone.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
atrazine was applied with tembotrionee0
Outcome
ear masse0
Direction
highere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
tembotrione alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were less variable with atrazine and tembotrione.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
atrazine was applied with tembotrionee0
Outcome
ear number and ear masse0
Direction
less variablee0
Comparator
tembotrione alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn ear number and ear mass were 9 and 13% higher, respectively, and less variable when atrazine was applied with tembotrione, compared to tembotrione alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude atrazine restrictions will require major changes in sweet corn weed management.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Outcome
major changes in sweet corn weed management systemse0
Qualifier
Additional restrictions or the complete loss of atrazinee0

Verbatim

e0

“Additional restrictions or the complete loss of atrazine for use in corn will necessitate major changes in sweet corn weed management systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1467 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Adding atrazine to PRE herbicides increased weed control by 25%.

    A Rationale for Atrazine Stewardship in Corn · 2007 · compared with PRE herbicides

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Adding atrazine to PRE herbicides increased corn yields by 8%.

    A Rationale for Atrazine Stewardship in Corn · 2007 · compared with PRE herbicides

    Same directionCited by this paper

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

tembotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 68 positive, 5 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.