Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Is There a Benefit of Adding Atrazine to HPPD-Inhibiting Herbicides for Control of Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant, Including Group 5-Resistant, Waterhemp in Corn?

Christian Willemse; Nader Soltani; Lauren Benoit; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The evolution of multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp (resistant to Groups 2, 5, 9, and 14) in Ontario, Canada is challenging for growers. The complementary activity of the co-application of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides with atrazine has been well documented. The objective of this research was to determine if the addition of atrazine to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides applied postemergence improves their consistency of MHR waterhemp (including Group 5 resistance) in corn. Five field trials were conducted over a two-year period (2018, 2019) in Ontario, Canada. Five HPPD-inhibiting herbicides [isoxaflutole (105 g ha-1), mesotrione (100 g ha-1), topramezone (12.5 g ha-1), tembotrione (90 g ha-1), and tolpyralate (30 g ha-1)] were applied postemergence with and without atrazine to 10-cm-tall waterhemp. Corn injury (≤ 10%) was observed at specific sites where the application of tembotrione, isoxaflutole and isoxaflutole + atrazine resulted in characteristic white bleaching of corn foliage; however, yield was not affected. Averaged across field sites, the addition of atrazine to isoxaflutole, mesotrione, topramezone, or tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control 15%, 11%, 7%, and 7%, respectively at 4 weeks after application (WAA). Averaged across herbicide treatments and sites, the addition of atrazine reduced the standard error of MHR waterhemp control by 13% to 100%. This study concludes that the co-application of atrazine with HPPD-inhibitors applied postemergence reduced the risk of herbicide failure and resulted in greater and more consistent control of MHR waterhemp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn injury of up to 10% was observed at specific sites after HPPD-inhibitor applications, with white bleaching of corn foliage.

Outcome
injurye1
Value
≤ 10%e1
Setting
specific sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn injury (≤ 10%) was observed at specific sites where the application of tembotrione, isoxaflutole and isoxaflutole + atrazine resulted in characteristic white bleaching of corn foliage; however, yield was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was not affected by the HPPD-inhibiting herbicide applications.

Treatment
tembotrione, isoxaflutole and isoxaflutole + atrazinee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn injury (≤ 10%) was observed at specific sites where the application of tembotrione, isoxaflutole and isoxaflutole + atrazine resulted in characteristic white bleaching of corn foliage; however, yield was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to isoxaflutole improved MHR waterhemp control by 15% at 4 weeks after application.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee2
Interactor
MHR waterhempe2weed
Outcome
MHR waterhemp controle2
Direction
improvede2
Value
15%e2
Qualifier
isoxaflutolee2
Comparator
without atrazinee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“the addition of atrazine to isoxaflutole, mesotrione, topramezone, or tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control 15%, 11%, 7%, and 7%, respectively at 4 weeks after application (WAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1319 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied postemergence with and without atrazine to 10-cm-tall waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to mesotrione improved MHR waterhemp control by 11% at 4 weeks after application.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee2
Interactor
MHR waterhempe2weed
Outcome
MHR waterhemp controle2
Direction
improvede2
Value
11%e2
Qualifier
mesotrionee2
Comparator
without atrazinee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“the addition of atrazine to isoxaflutole, mesotrione, topramezone, or tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control 15%, 11%, 7%, and 7%, respectively at 4 weeks after application (WAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1319 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied postemergence with and without atrazine to 10-cm-tall waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to topramezone improved MHR waterhemp control by 7% at 4 weeks after application.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee2
Interactor
MHR waterhempe2weed
Outcome
MHR waterhemp controle2
Direction
improvede2
Value
7%e2
Qualifier
topramezonee2
Comparator
without atrazinee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“the addition of atrazine to isoxaflutole, mesotrione, topramezone, or tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control 15%, 11%, 7%, and 7%, respectively at 4 weeks after application (WAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1319 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied postemergence with and without atrazine to 10-cm-tall waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding atrazine to tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control by 7% at 4 weeks after application.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee2
Interactor
MHR waterhempe2weed
Outcome
MHR waterhemp controle2
Direction
improvede2
Value
7%e2
Qualifier
tembotrionee2
Comparator
without atrazinee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“the addition of atrazine to isoxaflutole, mesotrione, topramezone, or tembotrione improved MHR waterhemp control 15%, 11%, 7%, and 7%, respectively at 4 weeks after application (WAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1319 · show in text ↑
e3

“applied postemergence with and without atrazine to 10-cm-tall waterhemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged across herbicides and sites, adding atrazine reduced the standard error of MHR waterhemp control by 13% to 100%.

Treatment
addition of atrazinee4
Interactor
MHR waterhempe4weed
Outcome
standard error of MHR waterhemp controle4
Direction
reducede4
Value
13% to 100%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Averaged across herbicide treatments and sites, the addition of atrazine reduced the standard error of MHR waterhemp control by 13% to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applying atrazine with postemergence HPPD-inhibitors reduced the risk of herbicide failure in waterhemp control.

Treatment
co-application of atrazine with HPPD-inhibitors applied postemergencee5
Outcome
risk of herbicide failuree5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Waterhemp in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–159 · show in text ↑
e5

“the co-application of atrazine with HPPD-inhibitors applied postemergence reduced the risk of herbicide failure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1599 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 205 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

atrazine · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

isoxaflutole · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tembotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 68 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.