Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide placement in the maize shoot zone severely inhibited the crown roots.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Studies were conducted to determine the effects of herbicide placement at different zones of maize ( Zea mays L.) and pea ( Pisum sativwm L.) shoots below the soil surface after emergence”
e4“severely inhibited the crown roots”
Title
SHOOT ZONE UPTAKE OF SOIL‐APPLIED HERBICIDES*
G. N. PRENDEVILLE Weed Research 1968. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1968.tb01408.x
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect EPTC, chlorpropham, propham and sulfallate did not affect pea shoot growth.
- Intervention effect Herbicide placement in the maize shoot zone next to the crown root node markedly reduced growth.
- Intervention effect Maize shoots were sensitive to diuron.
- Intervention effect Pea shoots were sensitive to diuron.
- Observation In pea, the uppermost shoot beneath the soil surface was the most sensitive zone to diuron.
- Observation In maize, the shoot adjacent to the crown root node was the most susceptible zone.
- Intervention effect Trifluralin did not affect maize growth when placed in the shoot zone after emergence.
- Intervention effect Trifluralin did not affect pea growth when placed in the shoot zone after emergence.
- Intervention effect Trifluralin severely inhibited the crown roots of maize.
- Intervention effect Naptalam, dalapon and 2,4‐D did not affect maize growth under similar conditions.
- Intervention effect Of the tested herbicides, only 2,4‐D reduced pea growth.