Paper · 1986 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF BLANCHING ON THE COLOR AND THE ASCORBIC ACID AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENTS OF GREEN BEANS

NEZIH MUFTUGIL

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
40
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching. Minimum adequate blanch time for complete peroxidase enzyme inactivation was less in the microwave oven. Weight loss was significant in the samples blanched in the convection oven due to moisture vaporization. Ascorbic acid was found to be significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the microwave blanched sample. The ascorbic acid contents of water blanched green beans were higher than those of steam blanched ones. Convection oven blanched green beans were found to be lowest in ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contents, and microwave treated samples were found to be highest. For equivalent peroxidase inactivation, more losses of chlorophyll were detected in steam blanched samples than in water blanched samples. The results of color measurements with a Hunterlab colormeter indicated that blanching with water and steam resulted in a more intense greenness of the samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanch time for complete peroxidase inactivation was shorter in the microwave oven.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
microwave ovene1
Gene
peroxidasee1
Outcome
Minimum adequate blanch timee1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Minimum adequate blanch time for complete peroxidase enzyme inactivation was less in the microwave oven”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight loss was significant in green beans blanched in the convection oven.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
convection ovene2
Outcome
Weight losse2
Qualifier
due to moisture vaporizatione2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weight loss was significant in the samples blanched in the convection oven due to moisture vaporization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid was significantly higher in the microwave-blanched green beans (P < 0.05).

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
microwave blanchede3
Outcome
Ascorbic acide3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
P < 0.05e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e3

“Ascorbic acid was found to be significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the microwave blanched sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid contents of water-blanched green beans were higher than those of steam-blanched ones.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
water blanchede4
Outcome
ascorbic acid contentse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
steam blanched onese4

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e4

“The ascorbic acid contents of water blanched green beans were higher than those of steam blanched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convection oven blanched green beans had the lowest ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contents compared with microwave treated samples.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
Convection oven blanchede5
Outcome
ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contentse5
Direction
loweste5
Comparator
microwave treated samplese5

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e5

“Convection oven blanched green beans were found to be lowest in ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contents, and microwave treated samples were found to be highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treated samples had the highest ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
microwave treated samplese5
Outcome
ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contentse5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e5

“Convection oven blanched green beans were found to be lowest in ascorbic acid and chlorophyll contents, and microwave treated samples were found to be highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam blanching caused more chlorophyll losses than water blanching at equivalent peroxidase inactivation.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
steam blanched samplese6
Outcome
losses of chlorophylle6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
water blanched samplese6

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e6

“For equivalent peroxidase inactivation, more losses of chlorophyll were detected in steam blanched samples than in water blanched samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanching with water and steam gave a more intense greenness of green beans, measured with a Hunterlab colormeter.

Taxon
Green beanse0
Treatment
blanching with water and steame7
Outcome
greennesse7
Direction
more intensee7
Qualifier
with a Hunterlab colormetere7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Green beans were blanched by four methods: water blanching, steam blanching, microwave blanching and convection oven blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results of color measurements with a Hunterlab colormeter indicated that blanching with water and steam resulted in a more intense greenness of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–996 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · quality: phytochemicals · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

processing · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.