Paper · 2010

Of Vegetables For Frozen Storage

S. J. Glasscock; Julein M. Axelson; James K. Palmer; et al.

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The quality of five vegetables, blanched using either microwave or hot water methods currently recommended to the American consumer, was examined after one, two, four, and six months of frozen storage. The vegetables were analyzed for residual peroxidase activity immediately after blanching. Storage stability of cooked and uncooked vegetables was determined by examining various quality factors after each period of frozen storage. Quality factors included color, texture, flavor, and overall acceptability of the vegetables as measured using objective methodology and sensory evaluation. Broccoli and zucchini retained high levels of peroxidase activity after microwave blanching. Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables (p 0.05) for quality factors commonly used by consumers. The texture of zucchini blanched with microwave energy was limp as measured by shear force and by sensory evaluation. No significant differences (p 0.05) were found in the quality of carrots or cauliflower blanched by the two methods. Instructions currently available for microwave blanching of vegetables for home freezing do not result in a quality product for all vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli retained high peroxidase activity after microwave blanching.

Treatment
microwave blanchinge0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and zucchini retained high levels of peroxidase activity after microwave blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–682 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zucchini retained high peroxidase activity after microwave blanching.

Treatment
microwave blanchinge0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and zucchini retained high levels of peroxidase activity after microwave blanching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched broccoli retained less chlorophyll than water-blanched vegetables.

Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched green beans retained less chlorophyll than water-blanched vegetables.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched broccoli had higher shear force than water-blanched vegetables.

Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
shear force valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched green beans had higher shear force than water-blanched vegetables.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
shear force valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched broccoli received lower sensory scores than water-blanched vegetables.

Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
sensory evaluation scorese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched green beans received lower sensory scores than water-blanched vegetables.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
sensory evaluation scorese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
water blanched vegetablese0

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and green beans blanched with microwave energy retained less chlorophyll (p ≤ 0.05), had higher shear force values (p 0.05), and received lower sensory evaluation scores than the water blanched vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-blanched zucchini had limp texture by shear force and sensory evaluation.

Treatment
microwave energye0
Outcome
texturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The texture of zucchini blanched with microwave energy was limp as measured by shear force and by sensory evaluation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot quality did not differ significantly between blanching methods.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
microwavee1
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
hot water methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences (p 0.05) were found in the quality of carrots or cauliflower blanched by the two methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“either microwave or hot water methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower quality did not differ significantly between blanching methods.

Treatment
microwavee1
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
hot water methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences (p 0.05) were found in the quality of carrots or cauliflower blanched by the two methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“either microwave or hot water methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Current microwave blanching instructions do not yield good quality for all vegetables frozen at home.

Taxon
vegetablese0
Outcome
do not result in a quality product for all vegetablese0

Verbatim

e0

“Instructions currently available for microwave blanching of vegetables for home freezing do not result in a quality product for all vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1332 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: general · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.