Paper · 2017 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

NUTRIENTS CONTENT AND TEXTURE CHANGES AS EFFECT OF HARVEST TIME, POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS AND STORAGE CONDITION OF CARROT

Zoran S. Ilić; Ljubomir Šunić; Lidija Milenković; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of harvest time (November or January) and postharvest treatments (hot water (50°C), H2O2 (1%), NaOCl (175 ppm)) and nonwashed-control of carrots (Daucus carrota L. cv. ‘Maestro F1’) on the changes in nutrient composition and texture under different storage conditions (S-1: 0°C, 98% RH; S-2: 0–2°C, 85–92% RH). Weight loss and quality changes in carrot roots were evaluated after 120 and 180 days of storage period (SP). After SP weight loss ranged from 3.20% (carrots from the first harvest in S-1 with H2O2 treatment) to 34.51% (carrots from the first harvest in S-2 with hot water treatment). Dry matter (DM) content in carrot roots varied in dependence of the harvest time (9.57–12.22%) and increased after the SP exept in carrot from first harvest with hot water and H2O2 treatments in S-1. Total sugar content (TSC) increased after SP, more in S-2 cooling room. Vitamin C content in carrot roots decreased more in S-2 (20.7–52.3%) in comparison to S-1 storage conditions (2.0–18.2%). The hardnessand flexibility of carrot roots increased after SP for all treatments. Prestorage washing treatments (H2O2 or NaOCl) and storage in S-1 storage regime at temperature (0°C) with a high relative humidity 98% maintained quality of carrot root.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored carrot root weight loss ranged from 3.20% under first harvest, S-1 and H2O2 treatment to 34.51% under first harvest, S-2 and hot water treatment.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
rangede0
Value
3.20%e0
Qualifier
first harvest in S-1 with H2O2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After SP weight loss ranged from 3.20% (carrots from the first harvest in S-1 with H2O2 treatment) to 34.51% (carrots from the first harvest in S-2 with hot water treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-harvest carrots in S-2 with hot water treatment had 34.51% weight loss.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Outcome
weight losse0
Value
34.51%e0
Qualifier
first harvest in S-2 with hot water treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After SP weight loss ranged from 3.20% (carrots from the first harvest in S-1 with H2O2 treatment) to 34.51% (carrots from the first harvest in S-2 with hot water treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot dry matter content varied with harvest time from 9.57 to 12.22%.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
carrot rootse0
Treatment
harvest timee0
Outcome
Dry matter (DM) contente0
Value
9.57–12.22%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter (DM) content in carrot roots varied in dependence of the harvest time (9.57–12.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot dry matter content increased after storage except under specified first-harvest S-1 treatments.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Treatment
SPe0
Outcome
Dry matter (DM) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
exept in carrot from first harvest with hot water and H2O2 treatments in S-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter (DM) content in carrot roots varied in dependence of the harvest time (9.57–12.22%) and increased after the SP exept in carrot from first harvest with hot water and H2O2 treatments in S-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar content increased after storage, more in S-2.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Treatment
SPe0
Outcome
Total sugar content (TSC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
more in S-2 cooling roome0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar content (TSC) increased after SP, more in S-2 cooling room”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content decreased by 20.7–52.3% in S-2.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Treatment
S-2e0
Outcome
Vitamin C contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20.7–52.3%e0
Qualifier
2.0–18.2%e0
Comparator
S-1 storage conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C content in carrot roots decreased more in S-2 (20.7–52.3%) in comparison to S-1 storage conditions (2.0–18.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot root hardness and flexibility increased after storage under all treatments.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Treatment
SPe0
Outcome
hardnessand flexibilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hardnessand flexibility of carrot roots increased after SP for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 or NaOCl washing and S-1 storage maintained carrot root quality.

Taxon
CARROTDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Prestorage washing treatments (H2O2 or NaOCl) and storage in S-1 storage regimee0
Outcome
quality of carrot roote0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
temperature (0°C) with a high relative humidity 98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prestorage washing treatments (H2O2 or NaOCl) and storage in S-1 storage regime at temperature (0°C) with a high relative humidity 98% maintained quality of carrot root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.