Paper · 2001 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of genotype of Trifolium repens on mycorrhizal symbiosis with Glomus mosseae

W. R. EASON; K. J. WEBB; T. P. T. MICHAELSON-YEATES; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Forty-three near-isogenic lines (NILs) of white clover ( Trifolium repens ), derived from four parental self-compatible genotypes containing the rare self-fertility allele, were inoculated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mossae . Plant growth response (shoot and root weight and root length), shoot P uptake and mycorrhizal root infection rates were recorded 12 weeks after inoculation. There was generally a high degree of variation between individual lines in all recorded parameters. The most sensitive indicator of plant response to mycorrhizal infection was root length with almost half of all lines showing significant responses (in most cases a decrease in root length). Shoot weight was significantly different between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants in nine lines. Parental genotype significantly affected both plant response to mycorrhiza as well as mycorrhizal infection rates. The results suggest that the NILs will prove useful for further studies to elucidate the molecular genetic control of the symbiosis and inform plant breeding strategies of this agronomically important species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Near-isogenic lines varied highly in recorded response parameters.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Material
individual linese0
Outcome
variation between individual linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was generally a high degree of variation between individual lines in all recorded parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length was the most sensitive response indicator; nearly half of lines had significant responses, mostly decreases.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
mycorrhizal infectione0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbionte0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
almost half of all linese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most sensitive indicator of plant response to mycorrhizal infection was root length with almost half of all lines showing significant responses (in most cases a decrease in root length).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens on mycorrhizal symbiosis with Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot weight differed significantly between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants in nine lines.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbionte0
Outcome
Shoot weighte0
Value
nine linese0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot weight was significantly different between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants in nine lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens on mycorrhizal symbiosis with Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental genotype significantly affected plant response to mycorrhiza.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Material
Parental genotypee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbionte0
Outcome
plant response to mycorrhizae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parental genotype significantly affected both plant response to mycorrhiza as well as mycorrhizal infection rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens on mycorrhizal symbiosis with Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parental genotype significantly affected mycorrhizal infection rates.

Taxon
Trifolium repensTrifolium repenst0
Material
Parental genotypee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbionte0
Outcome
mycorrhizal infection ratese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parental genotype significantly affected both plant response to mycorrhiza as well as mycorrhizal infection rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Trifolium repens on mycorrhizal symbiosis with Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–83 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · Funneliformis mosseae · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.