Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Long‐Term Effects of Fertilizers on the Soil Fertility and Productivity of a Rice–Wheat System

A. Kumar; D. S. Yadav

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
76
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice–wheat cropping system to which graded levels of NPK fertilizers had been applied for 20 years were compared for yield trends, and changes in response function, soil organic‐C and available N, P, K and S status. This study of system in which only chemical fertilizers had been used over a long period enabled long‐term yield declines of rice and wheat at different levels and combinations of NPK fertilizers to be evaluated. The highest rate of yield decline in both rice and wheat was found when 120 kg ha −1 N was applied alone. The lowest rate of decline was observed when all three nutrients (N, P and K) were applied, at 40, 35 and 33 kg ha −1 for N, P and K, respectively, followed by 120, 35 and 33 kg ha −1 (currently recommended levels). The yield response of rice and wheat to N fertilizer declined over the 20 years, with a higher rate of decline in wheat. In contrast, the response to applied P and K increased with time in both crops, with a higher response rate in wheat. With continuous application of N and P fertilizers, there was a marginal change in available N and K in the soil over time, but an approximately 3‐fold increase in available P and an approximately 2‐fold increase in available S were obtained by regular dressing of P fertilizer (SSP: 7 % P, 12 % S) over 20 years. The results revealed that balanced, high doses of NPK fertilizers are required to maintain soil fertility and raise grain yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying N alone at 120 kg ha −1 produced the highest yield decline rate in rice and wheat.

Treatment
120 kg ha −1 Ne0
Outcome
yield declinee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rate of yield decline in both rice and wheat was found when 120 kg ha −1 N was applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all three nutrients at 40, 35 and 33 kg ha −1 gave the lowest yield decline rate.

Treatment
all three nutrients (N, P and K)e0
Outcome
rate of declinee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
40, 35 and 33 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest rate of decline was observed when all three nutrients (N, P and K) were applied, at 40, 35 and 33 kg ha −1 for N, P and K, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to N fertilizer declined over 20 years in both crops, faster in wheat.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
higher rate of decline in wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response of rice and wheat to N fertilizer declined over the 20 years, with a higher rate of decline in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response to P and K fertilizer increased over time in both crops, more rapidly in wheat.

Treatment
applied P and Ke0
Outcome
response to applied P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher response rate in wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response to applied P and K increased with time in both crops, with a higher response rate in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous N and P fertilization produced only marginal changes in soil available N and K.

Treatment
continuous application of N and P fertilizerse0
Outcome
available N and K in the soile0
Direction
marginal changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With continuous application of N and P fertilizers, there was a marginal change in available N and K in the soil over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular P fertilizer dressing increased soil available P about threefold.

Treatment
P fertilizere1
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
approximately 3‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 3‐fold increase in available P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“P fertilizer (SSP: 7 % P, 12 % S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular P fertilizer dressing increased soil available S about twofold.

Treatment
P fertilizere1
Outcome
available Se0
Direction
increasee0
Value
approximately 2‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 2‐fold increase in available S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“P fertilizer (SSP: 7 % P, 12 % S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced high NPK doses are required to maintain soil fertility and increase grain yields.

Treatment
balanced, high doses of NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
maintain soil fertility and raise grain yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced, high doses of NPK fertilizers are required to maintain soil fertility and raise grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice–Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.