Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

THE EFFECT OF SILICON APPLICATION AND TYPE OF MEDIUM ON YIELDING AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF TOMATO

Zbigniew Jarosz

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilization of plants with silicon is particularly justified in soilless culture in which the roots of plants cannot use silicon resources in the soil. Silicon is the only element that does not harm plants when taken up in excessive amounts and its use in plant fertilization improves the yielding ability of plants and their resistance to various stress factors. The effectiveness of silicon application in growing plants is strictly dependent on both the source of this element, plant species and cultivars. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of root application of colloidal silicon as well as of three types of growing media of different silica content and varying ability to release orthosilicate monomers (rockwool, sand, straw) on yield and chemical composition of greenhouse tomato. The research was conducted in greenhouse in the period 2008–2009. Tomato was grown in an extended growth cycle (22 clusters) using a drip irrigation and fertilization system with closed nutrient solution circulation. Tomato plants fertigated with the nutrient solution enriched with silicon showed significantly higher total fruit yield (15.98 kg·plant-1) compare to plant grown in control treatments. In the studies not found significant differences in total and marketable yield as well as in mean fruit weight between plants grown in rockwool and straw mediums. The total fruit yield of tomato plants grown in sand was lower compared to rockwool-grown plants. The fruit of tomato grown in sand was shown to have more dry matter (5.52%), total sugars (2.58% FR.W.) and potassium (4.19% DW) compared to rockwool culture as well as significantly the highest amount of silicon. The leaves of tomato fertilized with the silicon-enriched nutrient solution contained more silicon as well as less manganese and zinc compared to control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-enriched nutrient solution significantly increased total fruit yield of tomato compared with control treatments.

Treatment
nutrient solution enriched with silicone1
Outcome
total fruit yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
15.98 kg·plant-1e1
Comparator
control treatmentse1
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants fertigated with the nutrient solution enriched with silicon showed significantly higher total fruit yield (15.98 kg·plant-1) compare to plant grown in control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1208 · show in text ↑
e2

“The research was conducted in greenhouse in the period 2008–2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw and rockwool growing media gave no significant difference in total and marketable yield or mean fruit weight of tomato.

Treatment
straw mediumse3
Outcome
total and marketable yielde3
Direction
not found significant differencese3
Qualifier
mean fruit weighte3
Comparator
rockwoole3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the studies not found significant differences in total and marketable yield as well as in mean fruit weight between plants grown in rockwool and straw mediums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato grown in sand had lower total fruit yield than tomato grown in rockwool.

Treatment
sande4
Outcome
total fruit yielde4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
rockwool-grown plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The total fruit yield of tomato plants grown in sand was lower compared to rockwool-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit grown in sand had more dry matter than fruit grown in rockwool culture, at 5.52%.

Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
sande5
Outcome
dry mattere5
Direction
moree5
Value
5.52%e5
Comparator
rockwool culturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The fruit of tomato grown in sand was shown to have more dry matter (5.52%), total sugars (2.58% FR.W.) and potassium (4.19% DW) compared to rockwool culture as well as significantly the highest amount of silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit grown in sand had more total sugars than fruit grown in rockwool culture, at 2.58% FR.W.

Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
sande5
Outcome
total sugarse5
Direction
moree5
Value
2.58% FR.W.e5
Comparator
rockwool culturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The fruit of tomato grown in sand was shown to have more dry matter (5.52%), total sugars (2.58% FR.W.) and potassium (4.19% DW) compared to rockwool culture as well as significantly the highest amount of silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit grown in sand had more potassium than fruit grown in rockwool culture, at 4.19% DW.

Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
sande5
Outcome
potassiume5
Direction
moree5
Value
4.19% DWe5
Comparator
rockwool culturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The fruit of tomato grown in sand was shown to have more dry matter (5.52%), total sugars (2.58% FR.W.) and potassium (4.19% DW) compared to rockwool culture as well as significantly the highest amount of silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit grown in sand had the highest amount of silicon compared with rockwool culture.

Organ / stage
fruite5
Treatment
sande5
Outcome
amount of silicone5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
rockwool culturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The fruit of tomato grown in sand was shown to have more dry matter (5.52%), total sugars (2.58% FR.W.) and potassium (4.19% DW) compared to rockwool culture as well as significantly the highest amount of silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-enriched nutrient solution increased silicon content of tomato leaves compared with control plants.

Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
silicon-enriched nutrient solutione6
Outcome
silicone6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
control plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The leaves of tomato fertilized with the silicon-enriched nutrient solution contained more silicon as well as less manganese and zinc compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-enriched nutrient solution decreased manganese and zinc content of tomato leaves compared with control plants.

Organ / stage
leavese6
Treatment
silicon-enriched nutrient solutione6
Outcome
manganese and zince6
Direction
lesse6
Comparator
control plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The leaves of tomato fertilized with the silicon-enriched nutrient solution contained more silicon as well as less manganese and zinc compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1845 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.