Paper · 2012 · PERENNIAL

PENGARUH DOSIS INOKULAN ALAMI (EKTOMIKORIZA) TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN SEMAI TENGKAWANG (Shorea pinanga)

. Gusmiaty; Muh. Restu; Ayu Lestari

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research aimed to know the effect of some doses of natural inoculants on the growth of Shorea pinanga seedling. The research was carried out with several steps including seed provision, inoculation of ectomycorrhyza, planting and maintenance in the nursery. The result of the research showed that height and number of branches were different at the significant level of 5 %, while diameter and number of leaves were not significantly different. The natural inoculants dose of 15 g showed the best growth in response to the increment of height, diameter, and number of leaves, while that of 20 g showed the best in the number of branches increment. Key words: Shorea pinanga, ectomycorrhyza, seedling, natural inoculantstor, Local Government Revenue, regional autonomy

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 g natural inoculant dose gave the best growth in height, diameter and number of leaves.

Taxon
Shorea pinangaRubroshorea pinangae0
Treatment
natural inoculants dose of 15 ge1
Outcome
increment of height, diameter, and number of leavese1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural inoculants on the growth of Shorea pinanga seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The natural inoculants dose of 15 g showed the best growth in response to the increment of height, diameter, and number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 g natural inoculant dose gave the best increment in number of branches.

Taxon
Shorea pinangaRubroshorea pinangae0
Treatment
natural inoculantse0
Outcome
number of branches incremente2
Direction
beste2
Qualifier
20 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural inoculants on the growth of Shorea pinanga seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“while that of 20 g showed the best in the number of branches increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and number of branches differed among natural inoculant doses at the 5% significance level.

Taxon
Shorea pinangaRubroshorea pinangae0
Treatment
natural inoculantse0
Outcome
height and number of branchese3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“natural inoculants on the growth of Shorea pinanga seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“height and number of branches were different at the significant level of 5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter and number of leaves did not differ significantly among natural inoculant doses.

Taxon
Shorea pinangaRubroshorea pinangae0
Treatment
natural inoculantse0
Outcome
diameter and number of leavese4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“natural inoculants on the growth of Shorea pinanga seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“while diameter and number of leaves were not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–448 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Rubroshorea pinangaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.