Paper · 2009 · HortTechnology

Large Single-head Broccoli Yield as Affected by Plant Density, Nitrogen, and Cultivar in a Plasticulture System

Daniel L. Schellenberg; Anthony D. Bratsch; Zhengxing Shen

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An open-market window has been identified in Virginia for fall broccoli ( Brassica oleracea var. italica ). Vegetable producers using plasticulture systems can capitalize on this opportunity by growing broccoli as a second crop after summer vegetables. The objective of this project was to evaluate suitability of two broccoli cultivars, Everest and Gypsy, for the fall production of large single-heads (>6 inches in diameter) for the fresh market. Planting density and rate of nitrogen (N) fertilizer (25, 60, and 100 lb/acre N) effects on yield characteristics were evaluated in a plasticulture system during a 3-year study (2003–05) conducted with broccoli transplants at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Kentland Agricultural Research Farm near Blacksburg, VA. The percentage of large heads was cultivar, plant density, and N rate dependent. The midseason ‘Gypsy’ produced significantly higher total yield and head weight compared with the early-season ‘Everest’. The optimum density to maximize floret production per area was 12,500 plants/acre and a supplemental N rate of 100 lb/acre. This N rate significantly ( P < 0.002) improved marketable yield, large head yield, and leaf N accumulation compared with the lower rates. The data indicate that the feasibility of growing fall broccoli using a plasticulture system depends on the number of large heads produced for the fresh market. This in turn will depend on the choice of cultivar, stand establishment, and the requirement for supplemental N fertilizer over the residual level available in the soil after the first crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage of large heads depended on cultivar, plant density and N rate.

Material
cultivare0
Treatment
plant density, and N ratee0
Outcome
percentage of large headse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of large heads was cultivar, plant density, and N rate dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsy had significantly higher total yield than Everest.

Material
Gypsye0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Evereste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The midseason ‘Gypsy’ produced significantly higher total yield and head weight compared with the early-season ‘Everest’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsy had significantly higher head weight than Everest.

Material
Gypsye0
Outcome
head weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Evereste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The midseason ‘Gypsy’ produced significantly higher total yield and head weight compared with the early-season ‘Everest’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum density for floret production per area was 12,500 plants/acre.

Outcome
floret production per areae0
Direction
maximizee0
Value
12,500 plants/acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum density to maximize floret production per area was 12,500 plants/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum supplemental nitrogen rate for floret production was 100 lb/acre.

Treatment
supplemental N ratee0
Outcome
floret production per areae0
Direction
maximizee0
Value
100 lb/acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum density to maximize floret production per area was 12,500 plants/acre and a supplemental N rate of 100 lb/acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 lb/acre supplemental N rate improved marketable yield over lower rates.

Treatment
This N ratee0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
lower ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This N rate significantly ( P < 0.002) improved marketable yield, large head yield, and leaf N accumulation compared with the lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 lb/acre supplemental N rate improved large head yield over lower rates.

Treatment
This N ratee0
Outcome
large head yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
lower ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This N rate significantly ( P < 0.002) improved marketable yield, large head yield, and leaf N accumulation compared with the lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 lb/acre supplemental N rate improved leaf N accumulation over lower rates.

Treatment
This N ratee0
Outcome
leaf N accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
lower ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This N rate significantly ( P < 0.002) improved marketable yield, large head yield, and leaf N accumulation compared with the lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 18–26 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

164 papers: 144 positive, 20 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.