Paper · 2005 · Folia Horticulturae

Broccoli yield and its quality in spring growing cycle as dependent on nitrogen fertilization.

Renata Wojciechowska; S. Rożek; A. Rydz

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The results of a 3 year experiment with broccoli Lord F1 grown under field conditions in the spring growing cycle are presented. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of mineral nitrogen fertilization and foliar urea nutrition on the yield and content of some compounds in broccoli heads. Four different levels of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) in the soil were used: natural content (12-25.5 mg N/cubic dm), fertilization with half of the full rate supplemented to the level of 75 mg N/cubic dm, fertilization with the full rate divided into halves (75+75 mg N/cubic dm), and with the single full rate of N supplemented to the level of 150 mg N/cubic dm. In each Nmin treatment additionally two combinations were applied: without and with foliar application of 2 percent urea solution. According to the investigation, generally no significant effect of the mineral nitrogen rate on the biological and marketable yield of broccoli as well as on its quality was observed. The foliar urea application significantly lowered concentration of nitrates in broccoli heads in comparison with the plants not treated with urea. Additionally, irrespective of the year of study the foliar nutrition increased soluble sugar content in all Nmin treatments. Moreover in each year of the experiment the increase of ascorbic acid content in broccoli heads treated with urea was showed

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen rate had no significant effect on broccoli biological.

Treatment
mineral nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generally no significant effect of the mineral nitrogen rate on the biological and marketable yield of broccoli as well as on its quality was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen rate had no significant effect on broccoli marketable yield.

Treatment
mineral nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generally no significant effect of the mineral nitrogen rate on the biological and marketable yield of broccoli as well as on its quality was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen rate had no significant effect on broccoli quality.

Treatment
mineral nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generally no significant effect of the mineral nitrogen rate on the biological and marketable yield of broccoli as well as on its quality was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea significantly lowered nitrate concentration in broccoli heads relative to untreated plants.

Organ / stage
headse0
Treatment
foliar urea applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of nitratese0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
plants not treated with ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar urea application significantly lowered concentration of nitrates in broccoli heads in comparison with the plants not treated with urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrition increased soluble sugar content across years and Nmin treatments.

Treatment
foliar nutritione0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in all Nmin treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrespective of the year of study the foliar nutrition increased soluble sugar content in all Nmin treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea treatment increased ascorbic acid content in broccoli heads each year.

Organ / stage
headse0
Treatment
treated with ureae0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in each year of the experiment the increase of ascorbic acid content in broccoli heads treated with urea was showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1371 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.