Paper · 2011 · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research

Can overstorey retention be used to control bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) during regeneration of forests?

Ralph Harmer; Andrea Kiewitt; Geoff Morgan

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Silvicultural systems which retain canopy cover during the regeneration phase have become an increasingly important form of management, but their effectiveness in controlling weed species has not been extensively studied. The development of bramble, which is a widespread competitive weed species, was observed within a c. 35-year-old Corsican pine stand thinned to remove 10, 20, 40 and 80 per cent of basal area. Cover, height and numbers of inflorescences and berries were recorded in each of the 3 years following thinning and were generally ranked according to intensity of thinning, but there were no significant differences between treatments. Shoot length, estimated using a grid-intersection method, was significantly lower in the 10 per cent compared with the 40 and 80 per cent thinning treatments. The initial length of bramble shoot present, and basal area and number of trees remaining could be used in various combinations to predict cover, height and shoot length. Although the bramble thicket was generally less well developed in the less-intense thinning treatments, these did not appear to enhance the establishment of trees. Seedlings grew best in the 80 per cent treatment and overall their mean heights were generally lower than that of bramble. Retention of overstorey cover in order to suppress bramble growth and promote tree seedling establishment during forest regeneration may not succeed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bramble cover, height, inflorescences and berries generally ranked with thinning intensity, without significant treatment differences.

Taxon
brambleRubust0
Treatment
intensity of thinninge0
Outcome
Cover, height and numbers of inflorescences and berriese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover, height and numbers of inflorescences and berries were recorded in each of the 3 years following thinning and were generally ranked according to intensity of thinning, but there were no significant differences between treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bramble shoot length was significantly lower with 10% than with 40% and 80% thinning.

Taxon
brambleRubust0
Treatment
10 per cente0
Outcome
Shoot lengthe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
40 and 80 per cent thinning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length, estimated using a grid-intersection method, was significantly lower in the 10 per cent compared with the 40 and 80 per cent thinning treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial bramble shoot length and remaining tree basal area and number predicted bramble cover, height and shoot length.

Taxon
brambleRubust0
Organ / stage
bramble shoote0
Outcome
cover, height and shoot lengthe0
Qualifier
basal area and number of trees remaininge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The initial length of bramble shoot present, and basal area and number of trees remaining could be used in various combinations to predict cover, height and shoot length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less intense thinning produced generally less developed bramble thickets.

Taxon
brambleRubust0
Treatment
less-intense thinning treatmentse0
Outcome
bramble thickete0
Direction
less well developede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bramble thicket was generally less well developed in the less-intense thinning treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less intense thinning did not appear to enhance tree establishment.

Treatment
less-intense thinning treatmentse1
Outcome
establishment of treese0
Direction
did not appear to enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio · Taxon · picture of the speciesKarl Gruber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these did not appear to enhance the establishment of trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“less-intense thinning treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1083 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corsican pine stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree seedlings grew best under 80% thinning.

Treatment
80 per cent treatmente0
Outcome
Seedlings grewe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio · Taxon · picture of the speciesKarl Gruber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings grew best in the 80 per cent treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corsican pine stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree seedlings were generally shorter than bramble.

Interactor
brambleRubuse0weed
Outcome
mean heightse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
bramblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio · Taxon · picture of the speciesKarl Gruber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their mean heights were generally lower than that of bramble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings grew best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1164 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corsican pine stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–354 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded overstorey retention may fail to suppress bramble and promote tree establishment.

Interactor
brambleRubuse0weed
Outcome
may not succeede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio · Taxon · picture of the speciesKarl Gruber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rubus
Rubus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Retention of overstorey cover in order to suppress bramble growth and promote tree seedling establishment during forest regeneration may not succeed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corsican pine stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–354 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Pinus nigra (black pine)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.