Paper · 2003 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Induction of the Hahsp17.7G4 Promoter by Root-Knot Nematodes: Involvement of Heat-Shock Elements in Promoter Activity in Giant Cells

Carolina Escobar; Marta Barcala; Mary Portillo; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes feed from specialized giant cells induced in the plants that they parasitize. We found that the promoter of the Hahsp17.7G4 gene, which encodes a small heat-shock protein involved in embryogenesis and stress responses, directed GUS expression in tobacco galls induced by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. In roots containing a GUS reporter fusion to the Hahsp17.7G4 promoter, 10% of the galls stained for GUS expression 1 to 3 days after infection and the fraction stained increased to 60 to 80% 17 to 20 days after infection. A DNA fragment from -83 to +163, which contains heat-shock element (HSE) core sequences, is sufficient to support a promoter activity largely restricted to giant cells within the galls. Two-point mutations in HSE cores, previously reported to abolish the heat-shock response and to strongly reduce the embryogenesis response of the same promoter, did not reduce expression in giant cells. This suggests a distinct regulation of the promoter by nematodes. However, additional point mutations located at positions crucial for binding of heat-shock transcription factors (HSFs) caused a severe decrease in the nematode response. These results demonstrate that HSEs are involved in the promoter activation in giant cells and suggest that HSFs may mediate this response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Hahsp17.7G4 promoter directed GUS expression in tobacco galls induced by Meloidogyne incognita.

Organ / stage
gallse2
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Gene
Hahsp17.7G4e1
Outcome
GUS expressione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“promoter of the Hahsp17.7G4 gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“directed GUS expression in tobacco galls induced by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% of the galls stained for GUS expression 1 to 3 days after infection.

Outcome
galls stained for GUS expressione1
Value
10%e1
Qualifier
1 to 3 days after infectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“10% of the galls stained for GUS expression 1 to 3 days after infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fraction of galls stained for GUS increased to 60 to 80% 17 to 20 days after infection.

Outcome
fraction stainede1
Direction
increasede1
Value
60 to 80%e1
Qualifier
17 to 20 days after infectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fraction stained increased to 60 to 80% 17 to 20 days after infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–557 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A DNA fragment from -83 to +163 containing HSE core sequences is sufficient for promoter activity largely restricted to giant cells within the galls.

Material
DNA fragment from -83 to +163e1
Organ / stage
giant cellse1
Outcome
promoter activity largely restricted to giant cellse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“A DNA fragment from -83 to +163, which contains heat-shock element (HSE) core sequences, is sufficient to support a promoter activity largely restricted to giant cells within the galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-point mutations in HSE cores did not reduce expression in giant cells.

Organ / stage
giant cellse1
Treatment
Two-point mutations in HSE corese1
Outcome
expression in giant cellse1
Direction
did not reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two-point mutations in HSE cores, previously reported to abolish the heat-shock response and to strongly reduce the embryogenesis response of the same promoter, did not reduce expression in giant cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional point mutations at positions crucial for binding of heat-shock transcription factors caused a severe decrease in the nematode response.

Treatment
additional point mutations located at positions crucial for binding of heat-shock transcription factorse1
Outcome
nematode responsee1
Direction
severe decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“additional point mutations located at positions crucial for binding of heat-shock transcription factors (HSFs) caused a severe decrease in the nematode response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1183 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HSEs are involved in the promoter activation in giant cells.

Gene
HSEse1
Outcome
promoter activation in giant cellse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results demonstrate that HSEs are involved in the promoter activation in giant cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1275 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HSFs may mediate the promoter response in giant cells.

Gene
HSFse1
Outcome
this responsee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggest that HSFs may mediate this response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1323 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a distinct regulation of the promoter by nematodes.

Outcome
distinct regulation of the promotere1
Qualifier
by nematodese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–279 · show in text ↑
e1

“This suggests a distinct regulation of the promoter by nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1012 · show in text ↑

heat · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

loss of function · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 14 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.