Paper · 2014 · Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia

Can Foliar Molybdenum Compensate for Damage to Barley Because of Draught Stress?

Sareh Mahdavi

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To evaluate the quantitative and qualitative responses of barley to foliar molybdenum in drought conditions, an experiment was conducted in 2013 in the Research Farm of Islamic Azad University of Shiraz. The experiment was iterated four times as split plots in the form of statistical design of randomized blocks. Main plots involved three levels of irrigation regimes including normal irrigation, mild stress (no irrigation at the beginning of grain filling) and high stress (no irrigation at early flowering). Subplots involved foliar molybdenum on three levels including foliar molybdenum with pure water, foliar molybdenum with 1% (10 per thousand) and 2% (20 per thousand) sodium molybdate. Results showed that stopping irrigation during reproductive growth significantly influences grain yield and most components of wheat grain yield. Grain yield decreased by 27% and 12% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation. Foliar molybdenum increased grain yield and many components of yield. Compared to control treatment, 1% and 2% foliar molybdenum increased grain yield by 6% and 7%, respectively. Effect of foliar molybdenum was significant on grain protein. Grain protein increased by 38% and 15% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation. In general, results of this study indicate the helpful role of molybdenum on improved quality of barley grain as well as alleviated damage of draught stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at flowering reduced grain yield by 27% relative to normal irrigation.

Treatment
no irrigation treatment at the beginning of floweringe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield decreased by 27% and 12% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at early grain filling reduced grain yield by 12% relative to normal irrigation.

Treatment
no irrigation treatment at early grain fillinge0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield decreased by 27% and 12% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar molybdenum increased grain yield and multiple yield components.

Treatment
Foliar molybdenume0
Outcome
grain yield and many components of yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar molybdenum increased grain yield and many components of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent foliar molybdenum increased grain yield by 6% versus control.

Treatment
1%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control treatment, 1% and 2% foliar molybdenum increased grain yield by 6% and 7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent foliar molybdenum increased grain yield by 7% versus control.

Treatment
2% foliar molybdenume0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control treatment, 1% and 2% foliar molybdenum increased grain yield by 6% and 7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar molybdenum significantly affected grain protein.

Treatment
foliar molybdenume0
Outcome
grain proteine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of foliar molybdenum was significant on grain protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at flowering increased grain protein by 38% relative to normal irrigation.

Treatment
no irrigation treatment at the beginning of floweringe0
Outcome
Grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein increased by 38% and 15% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stopping irrigation at early grain filling increased grain protein by 15% relative to normal irrigation.

Treatment
no irrigation treatment at early grain fillinge0
Outcome
Grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein increased by 38% and 15% during no irrigation treatment at the beginning of flowering and no irrigation treatment at early grain filling, respectively, compared with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

109 papers: 83 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
    Two irrigations with 90 kg nitrogen per hectare gave the highest protein content compared with the other irrigation and nitrogen treatments.

    Effect of levels of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake in barley · 2019 · compared with other irrigations (no irrigation, one irrigation at tillering stage, one irrigation at flag leaf stage) and nitrogen treatments (0, 30 and 60 kg ha-1)

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

stage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.