Paper · 2015 · International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology

Attempts to Create Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Superior High-Yielded Variety through Mutation Breeding

Irfan Suliansyah; Irawati Chaniago; Hendra Alfi

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Experiments to determine radiation dose effective for increasing wheat genetic diversity has been conducted from March to May 2015. Wheat seeds radiation was carried out at Research Center and PATIR BATAN, South Jakarta, followed by wheat growth screening at greenhouse of PATPKP UNAND at Alahan Panjang, Municipality of Solok, the Province of West Sumatra. Wheat genotypes of IS-Jarissa dan GURI 6 UNAND were subjected to gamma radiation as follow: 0.1; 0.2; 0.3; 0.4; 0.5; 0.6; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9; 1.0 kGy; and 0 kGy as control treatment. The wheat seeds were then grown in a mixture of soil and cow manure (3:1) w/w in a greenhouse. Data demonstrated that increasing the radiation doses resulted in decreasing in wheat growth. The effective doses of gamma radiation were 0.2 and 0.3 kGy. No wheat grown observed from the treatment groups of 0.5kGy gamma radiation and higher.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth decreased with increasing radiation dose.

Treatment
radiation dosese0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the radiation doses resulted in decreasing in wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–723 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective gamma radiation dose was 0.2 kGy.

Outcome
effective doses of gamma radiatione0
Value
0.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effective doses of gamma radiation were 0.2 and 0.3 kGy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–784 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective gamma radiation dose was 0.3 kGy.

Outcome
effective doses of gamma radiatione0
Value
0.3 kGye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effective doses of gamma radiation were 0.2 and 0.3 kGy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No wheat grew following gamma radiation at 0.5 kGy or above.

Treatment
0.5kGy gamma radiation and highere0
Outcome
No wheat growne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No wheat grown observed from the treatment groups of 0.5kGy gamma radiation and higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–872 · show in text ↑

radiation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.