Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of heat shock during grain filling on grain quality of bread and durum wheats

B Borghi; M Corbellini; M Ciaffi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In southern Europe the Mediterranean climate is responsible for the remarkable variability in both yield and quality from year to year and also from location to location, but it offers also a unique opportunity for the production of high-quality wheats which are deficient in the European Economic Community. This study was conducted to determine the role of the fluctuation of temperatures during grain filling on the rheological properties of bread and durum wheats (Triticum aestivum and Triticum turgidum) as evaluated with a Chopin alveograph. During the 1991-92 season, four cultivars of bread and durum wheat were grown in several locations scattered along the Italian peninsula and the island of Sicily. In each location different temperature profiles were imposed during grain filling by anticipating or delaying sowing date or by covering the plots with plastic tunnels. Viscoelastic properties, evaluated by the variations in W, P and L alveograph parameters were significantly affected by the imposed treatments. In presence of a long period of temperature in the range of 30-35¦C a dough 'strengthening' effect was observed, while frequent episodes of daily maximum temperatures above 35¦C led to a dough 'weakening' effect. These results observed both in durum and bread wheat confirm those firstly detected on bread wheat in Australia in areas charcterized by a Mediterranean-like climate. The practical relevance of these effects differs in the two species: an increase of dough strength is considered detrimental in breadmaking quality, while it exerts a positive effect in pastamaking quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imposed temperature treatments significantly affected W, P and L alveograph properties.

Taxon
wheatsTriticumt0
Treatment
imposed treatmentse0
Outcome
Viscoelastic propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Viscoelastic properties, evaluated by the variations in W, P and L alveograph parameters were significantly affected by the imposed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A long period at 30-35¦C strengthened dough.

Taxon
wheatsTriticumt0
Treatment
a long period of temperature in the range of 30-35¦Ce0
Outcome
dough 'strengthening' effecte0
Direction
strengtheninge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In presence of a long period of temperature in the range of 30-35¦C a dough 'strengthening' effect was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent daily maxima above 35¦C weakened dough.

Taxon
wheatsTriticumt0
Treatment
frequent episodes of daily maximum temperatures above 35¦Ce0
Outcome
dough 'weakening' effecte0
Direction
weakeninge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“frequent episodes of daily maximum temperatures above 35¦C led to a dough 'weakening' effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dough strength was considered detrimental for breadmaking quality.

Taxon
wheatsTriticumt0
Outcome
breadmaking qualitye0
Direction
detrimentale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of dough strength is considered detrimental in breadmaking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–84 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dough strength was considered beneficial for pastamaking quality.

Taxon
wheatsTriticumt0
Outcome
pastamaking qualitye0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it exerts a positive effect in pastamaking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–84 · show in text ↑