Abstract
Four local grape cultivars (Halawani, Beiruiti Zaini and Beituni) were bench grafted on four different grape rootstocks (B41, Paulsen, Rugerri and Richter). Two grafting methods were used: whip tongue and wedge grafting. The experiment was conducted for two successive seasons (1997 and 1998). All rootstock basis were treated with Indolebutyric- acid (IBA) at 8000 ppm in the form of powder. The results showed a great variability in the rooting ability of the different rootstocks with Paulsen rootstock which resulted in the higher rooting ability, while Rugerri and B41 resulted significantly in the lower rooting percentage in both seasons. The scion as well as the grafting method did not affect the rooting ability of the rootstocks. The rootstock scion combination showed high healing ability with a significant interaction between both graft partners. Rugerri and Richter resulted in the highest healing of grafts. The vegetative bud growth of the graft varied among the different scion cultivars but without any significant effect of grafting method or rootstocks in both seasons. Both Halawani and Beiruiti resulted in the higher vegetative growth during propagation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Paulsen had higher rooting ability.
Verbatim
e0“Paulsen rootstock which resulted in the higher rooting ability”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Rugerri had a significantly lower rooting percentage.
Verbatim
e0“Rugerri and B41 resulted significantly in the lower rooting percentage in both seasons”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
B41 had a significantly lower rooting percentage.
Verbatim
e0“Rugerri and B41 resulted significantly in the lower rooting percentage in both seasons”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion cultivar did not affect rootstock rooting ability.
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“The scion as well as the grafting method did not affect the rooting ability of the rootstocks”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting method did not affect rootstock rooting ability.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- grafting methode0
- Outcome
- rooting ability of the rootstockse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The scion as well as the grafting method did not affect the rooting ability of the rootstocks”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock and scion combinations had high graft healing with a significant interaction.
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“The rootstock scion combination showed high healing ability with a significant interaction between both graft partners”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Rugerri had the highest graft healing.
Verbatim
e0“Rugerri and Richter resulted in the highest healing of grafts”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Richter had the highest graft healing.
Verbatim
e0“Rugerri and Richter resulted in the highest healing of grafts”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative bud growth varied among scion cultivars.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Material
- different scion cultivarse0
- Outcome
- vegetative bud growth of the grafte0
- Direction
- variede0
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“The vegetative bud growth of the graft varied among the different scion cultivars”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting method had no significant effect on vegetative bud growth.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- grafting methode0
- Outcome
- vegetative bud growthe1
- Direction
- without any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“without any significant effect of grafting method or rootstocks in both seasons”
t0“Grape”
e1“The vegetative bud growth of the graft varied among the different scion cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstocks had no significant effect on vegetative bud growth.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Material
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- vegetative bud growth of the grafte0
- Direction
- without any significant effecte0
Not reportedSetting
Verbatim
e0“The vegetative bud growth of the graft varied among the different scion cultivars but without any significant effect of grafting method or rootstocks in both seasons”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Halawani produced higher vegetative growth.
Verbatim
e0“Both Halawani and Beiruiti resulted in the higher vegetative growth during propagation”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Beiruiti produced higher vegetative growth.
Verbatim
e0“Both Halawani and Beiruiti resulted in the higher vegetative growth during propagation”
t0“Grape”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.