Paper · 2014 · Journal of Medicinal Plants Research

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, mineral composition and production of essential oil in Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata (Ehrh.) Briq. under two phosphorus levels

Veronica Cordeiro Silva; Patricia Alves Casaes Alves; Rosilene Aparecida de Oliveira; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), Acaulospora morrowiae, Rhizophagus clarus and Scutellospora calospora on the growth and essential oil production of Mentha piperita L. var. citrata plants. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a 5 2 factorial design with five mycorrhizal treatments (uninoculated control, Acaulospora morrowiae, Rhizophagus clarus and Scutellospora calospora, and mixture of inocula) and two P levels (60 and 120 mg P dm -3 soil) with six replicates. Plants were harvested after 75 days of growth for evaluation of dry biomass, mycorrhizal colonization of roots, number of spores in soil, nutrient content of leaves, and composition, content and yield of essential oil. The mycorrhizal treatments influenced all the characteristics evaluated, except the number of spores in soil. AMF colonization was most evident at the lowest dose of phosphate fertilizer applied, except for R. clarus, and in all treatments mycorrhizal colonization was above 45%. Colonization also influenced the nutrient content of the leaves of M. piperita var citrata and increased leaf dry biomass. The content and yield of essential oils were higher in plants colonized by AMF fungi with the 60 mg P fertilization dose, except those colonized by R. clarus which had higher essential oil production only with the 120 mg dm -3 P treatment. The two major components in the essential oils for the plants in all the treatments were linalool and linalyl acetate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation treatments influenced all characteristics evaluated in Mentha piperita var. citrata, except the number of spores in soil.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal treatmentse1
Outcome
all the characteristics evaluatede1
Qualifier
except the number of spores in soile1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mycorrhizal treatments influenced all the characteristics evaluated, except the number of spores in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF root colonization of Mentha piperita var. citrata was most evident at the lowest phosphate fertilizer dose applied, except for plants with R. clarus.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Treatment
lowest dose of phosphate fertilizer appliede1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonizatione1
Direction
most evidente1
Qualifier
except for R. claruse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“AMF colonization was most evident at the lowest dose of phosphate fertilizer applied, except for R. clarus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization of roots was above 45% in all treatments.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione1
Value
above 45%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in all treatments mycorrhizal colonization was above 45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization influenced the nutrient content of the leaves of M. piperita var citrata; direction not stated.

Taxon
M. piperita var citrataMentha ×piperitae1
Treatment
Colonizatione1
Outcome
nutrient content of the leavese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Colonization also influenced the nutrient content of the leaves of M. piperita var citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization increased leaf dry biomass of M. piperita var citrata.

Taxon
M. piperita var citrataMentha ×piperitae1
Treatment
Colonizatione1
Outcome
leaf dry biomasse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Colonization also influenced the nutrient content of the leaves of M. piperita var citrata and increased leaf dry biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil content and yield were higher in Mentha piperita var. citrata plants colonized by AMF at the 60 mg P fertilization dose.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Treatment
colonized by AMF fungi with the 60 mg P fertilization dosee1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
content and yield of essential oilse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The content and yield of essential oils were higher in plants colonized by AMF fungi with the 60 mg P fertilization dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants colonized by R. clarus had higher essential oil production only with the 120 mg dm -3 P treatment.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Treatment
120 mg dm -3 P treatmente1
Interactor
R. clarusRhizophagus claruse1symbiont
Outcome
essential oil productione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
only with the 120 mg dm -3 P treatmente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“except those colonized by R. clarus which had higher essential oil production only with the 120 mg dm -3 P treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linalool and linalyl acetate were the two major components of the essential oils in all treatments.

Taxon
Mentha × piperita L. var. citrataMentha aquatica var. citratat0
Outcome
linalool and linalyl acetatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha aquatica var. citrata
Mentha aquatica var. citrata · Taxon · picture of the speciesKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The two major components in the essential oils for the plants in all the treatments were linalool and linalyl acetate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mentha × piperita L. var. citrata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–141 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Mentha aquatica (water mint)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.