Paper · 2001 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

The yield, quality and irrigation response of summer forage crops suitable for a dairy pasture renovation program in north-western Tasmania

R. J. Eckard; A. A. Salardini; M. Hannah; et al.

17
claims
19
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The yield and quality of perennial ryegrass, short-rotation ryegrass–perennial ryegrass mix, oats, millet, maize, rape, kale, pasja and turnips were determined over a 13-week summer period in 1995–96 and 1996–97. The experiment was conducted on the Elliott Research Station in north-western Tasmania (145°E, 41°S) and consisted of 2 irrigated and 2 dryland main plots. Within each main plot was a randomised complete block design with 9 forage crop subplots. Where forage is required through the summer, there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture, mainly as the former still require replacement with permanent pasture in the autumn. However, if additional forage is required from late January then turnips are clearly superior to the other forages evaluated in all respects, apart from a low bulb crude protein (CP) content. Turnips responded significantly to irrigation, producing between 15 and 22 kg DM/ha.mm irrigation applied, with yields ranging between 7.9 and 10.6 t DM/ha dryland and between 13.5 and 14.4 t DM/ha under irrigation. The metabolisable energy (ME) and CP contents of turnips were 12.5 MJ/kg DM and 12.4% in the shoots and 13.4 MJ/kg DM and 7.0% in the bulbs, respectively. In comparison, the other fodder crops tested yielded between 4 and 6 t DM/ha under dryland conditions and between 5 and 7 t DM/ha under irrigated conditions. Turnips were most economic, costing on average A$120/t DM irrigated and $160/t DM dryland, while spring renovation to perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated and $344/t DM dryland; clearly more expensive than purchased feeds for this period. These findings confirm the choice of many farmers that, of the species examined, turnips are the most suitable as a summer fodder crop, both irrigated or dryland, and integrate well with a pasture renovation rotation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Taxon
millete0
Outcome
little advantagee0
Comparator
spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Verbatim

e0

“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Outcome
little advantagee0
Comparator
spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips were superior for forage needed from late January except for low bulb protein.

Outcome
clearly superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
low bulb crude protein (CP) contente0
Comparator
other foragese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if additional forage is required from late January then turnips are clearly superior to the other forages evaluated in all respects, apart from a low bulb crude protein (CP) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips responded significantly to irrigation at 15 to 22 kg dry matter per irrigation millimeter.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
kg DM/ha.mm irrigation appliede0
Direction
respondede0
Value
15 and 22 kg DM/ha.mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turnips responded significantly to irrigation, producing between 15 and 22 kg DM/ha.mm irrigation applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip dryland yield ranged from 7.9 to 10.6 t dry matter per hectare.

Outcome
yieldse0
Value
7.9 and 10.6 t DM/hae0
Setting
drylande0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“yields ranging between 7.9 and 10.6 t DM/ha dryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip irrigated yield ranged from 13.5 to 14.4 t dry matter per hectare.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
t DM/hae0
Value
13.5 and 14.4 t DM/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“between 13.5 and 14.4 t DM/ha under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1089 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip shoot metabolizable energy was 12.5 MJ/kg dry matter.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
metabolisable energy (ME)e0
Value
12.5 MJ/kg DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The metabolisable energy (ME) and CP contents of turnips were 12.5 MJ/kg DM and 12.4% in the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip shoot crude protein was 12.4%.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
CP contentse0
Value
12.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The metabolisable energy (ME) and CP contents of turnips were 12.5 MJ/kg DM and 12.4% in the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1190 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip bulb metabolizable energy was 13.4 MJ/kg dry matter.

Organ / stage
bulbse0
Outcome
MJ/kg DMe0
Value
13.4 MJ/kg DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.4 MJ/kg DM and 7.0% in the bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“contents of turnips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip bulb crude protein was 7.0%.

Organ / stage
bulbse0
Outcome
7.0%e0
Value
7.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.4 MJ/kg DM and 7.0% in the bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“contents of turnips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other fodder crops yielded 4 to 6 t dry matter per hectare under dryland conditions.

Taxon
fodder cropse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
4 and 6 t DM/hae0
Setting
dryland conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“other fodder crops tested yielded between 4 and 6 t DM/ha under dryland conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1347 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other fodder crops yielded 5 to 7 t dry matter per hectare when irrigated.

Taxon
fodder cropse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
5 and 7 t DM/hae0
Setting
irrigated conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“other fodder crops tested yielded between 4 and 6 t DM/ha under dryland conditions and between 5 and 7 t DM/ha under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips were the most economic forage at A$120/t DM irrigated.

Outcome
costinge0
Value
A$120/t DMe0
Setting
irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turnips were most economic, costing on average A$120/t DM irrigated and $160/t DM dryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips cost $160/t DM dryland.

Outcome
costinge0
Value
$160/t DMe0
Setting
drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turnips were most economic, costing on average A$120/t DM irrigated and $160/t DM dryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Outcome
coste0
Value
$385/t DMe0
Setting
irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring renovation to perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated and $344/t DM dryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $344/t DM dryland.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Outcome
coste0
Value
$344/t DMe0
Setting
drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring renovation to perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated and $344/t DM dryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1587 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips were considered most suitable summer fodder under irrigation or dryland management.

Outcome
most suitable as a summer fodder crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“turnips are the most suitable as a summer fodder crop, both irrigated or dryland, and integrate well with a pasture renovation rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1866 · show in text ↑