Paper · 2012 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Utilization of seaweed Sargassum myriocystum extracts as a stimulant of seedlings of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper

C. Kalaivanan; V. Venkatesalu

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of seaweed liquid fertilizer (SLF) of Sargassum myriocystum on germination, growth and biochemical constituents of Vigna mungo was studied. Different concentrations (5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%) of SLF were prepared using distilled water. A total of 100 seeds were soaked for each SLF concentration for a 24-h period and were later placed in various Petri plates and watered regularly. Water-soaked seeds were used as controls. Seed germination was 98% for the 10% SLF soaked seeds. Similarly, shoot length (21.13 cm seedling-1), root length (12.19 cm seedling-1), fresh weight and dry weight (3.910 and 0.320 g seedling-1) recorded at 10% concentration of S. myriocystum treated seedlings were the highest. Besides, the chlorophyll (0.547 mg g-1 fr. wt.) and carotenoid (0.359 mg g-1 fr. wt.) contents in leaves recorded at 10% SLF soaked seedlings were the highest. The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively. The seaweed extract showed better response at lower concentration while higher concentrations of seaweed extract showed a decreasing trend.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds soaked in 10% SLF had 98% germination.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination was 98% for the 10% SLF soaked seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% extract produced the highest shoot length, 21.13 cm per seedling.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% concentration of S. myriocystume0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.13 cm seedling-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, shoot length (21.13 cm seedling-1), root length (12.19 cm seedling-1), fresh weight and dry weight (3.910 and 0.320 g seedling-1) recorded at 10% concentration of S. myriocystum treated seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% extract produced the highest root length, 12.19 cm per seedling.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% concentration of S. myriocystume0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.19 cm seedling-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, shoot length (21.13 cm seedling-1), root length (12.19 cm seedling-1), fresh weight and dry weight (3.910 and 0.320 g seedling-1) recorded at 10% concentration of S. myriocystum treated seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% extract produced highest fresh weight, 3.910 g per seedling.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% concentration of S. myriocystume0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.910e0
Qualifier
g seedling-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight and dry weight (3.910 and 0.320 g seedling-1) recorded at 10% concentration of S. myriocystum treated seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% extract produced highest dry weight, 0.320 g per seedling.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% concentration of S. myriocystume0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.320 g seedling-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight and dry weight (3.910 and 0.320 g seedling-1) recorded at 10% concentration of S. myriocystum treated seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF gave highest leaf chlorophyll content, 0.547 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.547 mg g-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, the chlorophyll (0.547 mg g-1 fr. wt.) and carotenoid (0.359 mg g-1 fr. wt.) contents in leaves recorded at 10% SLF soaked seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF gave highest leaf carotenoid content, 0.359 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
carotenoide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.359 mg g-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, the chlorophyll (0.547 mg g-1 fr. wt.) and carotenoid (0.359 mg g-1 fr. wt.) contents in leaves recorded at 10% SLF soaked seedlings were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot protein, 1.898 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.898e0
Qualifier
mg g–1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root protein, 1.508 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
content of proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot amino acid content, 0.370 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
amino acide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.370e0
Qualifier
mg g–1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root amino acid content, 0.306 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
amino acide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot reducing sugar, 6.031 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.031e0
Qualifier
mg g-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root reducing sugar, 3.448 mg per gram fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot total sugar, 8.414 mg per millilitre fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.414e0
Qualifier
mg mL-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root total sugar, 7.055 mg per millilitre fresh weight.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot alpha-amylase activity, 1.403 micrograms per minute per mg protein.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
alpha-amylase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.403e0
Qualifier
μg min-1 mg-1 proteine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root alpha-amylase activity, 1.380 micrograms per minute per mg protein.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
alpha-amylase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 proteine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest shoot beta-amylase activity, 1.099 micrograms per minute per mg protein.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
beta-amylase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.099e0
Qualifier
μg min-1 mg-1 proteine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% SLF produced highest root beta-amylase activity, 1.029 micrograms per minute per mg protein.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
beta-amylase activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 proteine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% SLF treated seedlings showed the highest content of protein (1.898 and 1.508 mg g–1 fr. wt.), amino acid (0.370 and 0.306 mg g–1 fr. wt.), reducing sugar (6.031 and 3.448 mg g-1 fr. wt.), total sugar (8.414 and 7.055 mg mL-1 fr. wt.), alpha-amylase activity (1.403 and 1.380 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) and beta-amylase activity (1.099 and 1.029 μg min-1 mg-1 protein) of shoots and roots respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower extract concentrations gave better responses while higher concentrations showed a decreasing trend.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
lower concentratione0
Outcome
better responsee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
higher concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seaweed extract showed better response at lower concentration while higher concentrations of seaweed extract showed a decreasing trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 87 positive, 2 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.