Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seeds soaked in 10% SLF had 98% germination.

A claim from Utilization of seaweed Sargassum myriocystum extracts as a stimulant of seedlings of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds soaked in 10% SLF had 98% germination.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
10% SLFe0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination was 98% for the 10% SLF soaked seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–491
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96

Title

Utilization of seaweed Sargassum myriocystum extracts as a stimulant of seedlings of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper

C. Kalaivanan; V. Venkatesalu Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2012. doi:10.5424/sjar/2012102-507-10

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-cf06a7f214daa56b4280e67e171466bdd45690f4fd9c978859ea879dc974b56d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

other · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 87 positive, 2 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.